Demographics details for Manheim, PA vs Litchfield park, AZ

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Manheim, PA vs Litchfield park, AZ.

Data Manheim Litchfield park
Population 5,012 6,960
Median Age 33.6 years 47.7 years
Median Income $75,833 $117,601
Married Families 39.0% 52.0%
Poverty Level 8% 5%
Unemployment Rate 4.5 5.1

Population Comparison: Manheim vs Litchfield park

  • The population in Litchfield park is higher at 6,960, compared to 5,012 in Manheim.
  • The median age in Litchfield park is higher at 47.7 years, compared to 33.6 years in Manheim.
  • Litchfield park has a higher median income of $117,601, compared to $75,833 in Manheim.
  • In Litchfield park, the percentage of married families is higher at 52.0%, compared to 39.0% in Manheim.
  • Manheim has a higher poverty level at 8% compared to 5% in Litchfield park.
  • Litchfield park has a higher unemployment rate at 5.1% compared to 4.5% in Manheim.

Demographics

Demographics Manheim vs Litchfield park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Manheim Litchfield park
Black 1 2
White 87 57
Asian Data is updating 6
Hispanic 5 23
Two or More Races 7 12
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Manheim vs Litchfield park

  • In Litchfield park, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 1% in Manheim.
  • Manheim has a higher percentage of White residents at 87% compared to 57% in Litchfield park.
  • In Litchfield park, the Asian population stands at 6%, greater than 0% in Manheim.
  • Litchfield park has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 23%, compared to 5% in Manheim.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Litchfield park at 12%, compared to 7% in Manheim.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Manheim and Litchfield park at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Manheim Litchfield park
Mental Health Not Good 16.3% 15.0%
Physical Health Not Good 11.3% 8.3%
Depression 23.4% 18.9%
Smoking 18.0% 10.7%
Binge Drinking 17.9% 18.9%
Obesity 35.4% 27.2%
Disability Percentage 11.0% 13.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Manheim vs Litchfield park

  • More residents in Manheim report poor mental health at 16.3% compared to 15.0% in Litchfield park.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Manheim at 23.4% compared to 18.9% in Litchfield park.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Manheim at 18.0% compared to 10.7% in Litchfield park.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Litchfield park at 18.9% compared to 17.9% in Manheim.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Manheim at 35.4% compared to 27.2% in Litchfield park.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Litchfield park at 13.0% compared to 11.0% in Manheim.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Manheim Litchfield park
No Schooling 0.8% (38) 0.2% (16)
High School Diploma 22.8% (1,142) 11.2% (777)
Less than High School 9.5% (474) 2.2% (150)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 19.6% (983) 36.0% (2,504)

Education Levels Comparison: Manheim vs Litchfield park

  • A higher percentage of residents in Manheim have no formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.2% in Litchfield park.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Manheim hold a high school diploma at 22.8% compared to 11.2% in Litchfield park.
  • More residents in Manheim have less than a high school education at 9.5% compared to 2.2% in Litchfield park.
  • In Litchfield park, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 36.0% compared to 19.6% in Manheim.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.