Demographics details for Manhattan, MT vs Starke, FL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Manhattan, MT vs Starke, FL.
| Data | Manhattan | Starke |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,120 | 5,864 |
| Median Age | 39.6 years | 35.1 years |
| Median Income | $57,045 | $42,976 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 25.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.7 |
Population Comparison: Manhattan vs Starke
- The population in Starke is higher at 5,864, compared to 2,120 in Manhattan.
- Residents in Manhattan have a higher median age of 39.6 years compared to 35.1 years in Starke.
- Manhattan has a higher median income of $57,045 compared to $42,976 in Starke.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Manhattan at 37.0% compared to 25.0% in Starke.
- The poverty level is higher in Starke at 15%, compared to 10% in Manhattan.
- The unemployment rate in Manhattan is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.7% in Starke.
Demographics
Demographics Manhattan vs Starke provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Manhattan | Starke |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 26 |
| White | 94 | 66 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 2 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 7 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Manhattan vs Starke
- In Starke, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 26% compared to 0% in Manhattan.
- Manhattan has a higher percentage of White residents at 94% compared to 66% in Starke.
- In Starke, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Manhattan.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Manhattan at 2% compared to 0% in Starke.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Starke at 7%, compared to 3% in Manhattan.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Manhattan at 1% compared to 0% in Starke.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Manhattan | Starke |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.4% | 19.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.0% | 14.7% |
| Depression | 22.7% | 21.0% |
| Smoking | 13.5% | 26.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 24.2% | 14.7% |
| Obesity | 24.2% | 38.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Manhattan vs Starke
- In Starke, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 14.4% in Manhattan.
- Depression is more prevalent in Manhattan at 22.7% compared to 21.0% in Starke.
- Starke has a higher smoking rate at 26.7% compared to 13.5% in Manhattan.
- Binge drinking is more common in Manhattan at 24.2% compared to 14.7% in Starke.
- Starke has higher obesity rates at 38.8% compared to 24.2% in Manhattan.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Starke at 17.0% compared to 12.0% in Manhattan.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Manhattan | Starke |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.1% (3) |
| High School Diploma | 15.3% (325) | 21.8% (1,278) |
| Less than High School | 0.6% (12) | 12.6% (740) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.5% (392) | 8.1% (475) |
Education Levels Comparison: Manhattan vs Starke
- In Starke, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.1% compared to 0.0% in Manhattan.
- In Starke, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.8% compared to 15.3% in Manhattan.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Starke at 12.6%, compared to 0.6% in Manhattan.
- A higher percentage of residents in Manhattan hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.5% compared to 8.1% in Starke.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.