Demographics details for Manhattan, MT vs Sparks, NV
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Manhattan, MT vs Sparks, NV.
Data | Manhattan | Sparks |
---|---|---|
Population | 2,120 | 109,226 |
Median Age | 39.6 years | 37.0 years |
Median Income | $57,045 | $82,938 |
Married Families | 37.0% | 38.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Manhattan vs Sparks
- The population in Sparks is higher at 109,226, compared to 2,120 in Manhattan.
- Residents in Manhattan have a higher median age of 39.6 years compared to 37.0 years in Sparks.
- Sparks has a higher median income of $82,938, compared to $57,045 in Manhattan.
- In Sparks, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 37.0% in Manhattan.
- The poverty level is identical in both Manhattan and Sparks at 10%.
- Sparks has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 4.2% in Manhattan.
Demographics
Demographics Manhattan vs Sparks provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Manhattan | Sparks |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 2 |
White | 94 | 43 |
Asian | Data is updating | 5 |
Hispanic | 2 | 34 |
Two or More Races | 3 | 15 |
American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Manhattan vs Sparks
- In Sparks, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 0% in Manhattan.
- Manhattan has a higher percentage of White residents at 94% compared to 43% in Sparks.
- In Sparks, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 0% in Manhattan.
- Sparks has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 34%, compared to 2% in Manhattan.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Sparks at 15%, compared to 3% in Manhattan.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Manhattan and Sparks at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Manhattan | Sparks |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 14.4% | 18.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.0% | 12.1% |
Depression | 22.7% | 19.9% |
Smoking | 13.5% | 17.0% |
Binge Drinking | 24.2% | 17.9% |
Obesity | 24.2% | 28.6% |
Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Manhattan vs Sparks
- In Sparks, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 14.4% in Manhattan.
- Depression is more prevalent in Manhattan at 22.7% compared to 19.9% in Sparks.
- Sparks has a higher smoking rate at 17.0% compared to 13.5% in Manhattan.
- Binge drinking is more common in Manhattan at 24.2% compared to 17.9% in Sparks.
- Sparks has higher obesity rates at 28.6% compared to 24.2% in Manhattan.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Sparks at 13.0% compared to 12.0% in Manhattan.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Manhattan | Sparks |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 1.4% (1,548) |
High School Diploma | 15.3% (325) | 14.7% (16,026) |
Less than High School | 0.6% (12) | 18.1% (19,717) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.5% (392) | 16.9% (18,457) |
Education Levels Comparison: Manhattan vs Sparks
- In Sparks, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.0% in Manhattan.
- A higher percentage of residents in Manhattan hold a high school diploma at 15.3% compared to 14.7% in Sparks.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Sparks at 18.1%, compared to 0.6% in Manhattan.
- A higher percentage of residents in Manhattan hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.5% compared to 16.9% in Sparks.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.