Demographics details for Manhattan, MT vs Hollister, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Manhattan, MT vs Hollister, NC.
Data | Manhattan | Hollister |
---|---|---|
Population | 2,120 | 847 |
Median Age | 39.6 years | 34.3 years |
Median Income | $57,045 | $39,913 |
Married Families | 37.0% | 40.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 20% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Manhattan vs Hollister
- In Manhattan, the population is higher at 2,120, compared to 847 in Hollister.
- Residents in Manhattan have a higher median age of 39.6 years compared to 34.3 years in Hollister.
- Manhattan has a higher median income of $57,045 compared to $39,913 in Hollister.
- In Hollister, the percentage of married families is higher at 40.0%, compared to 37.0% in Manhattan.
- The poverty level is higher in Hollister at 20%, compared to 10% in Manhattan.
- Hollister has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 4.2% in Manhattan.
Demographics
Demographics Manhattan vs Hollister provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Manhattan | Hollister |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 16 |
White | 94 | 21 |
Asian | Data is updating | 5 |
Hispanic | 2 | 4 |
Two or More Races | 3 | 13 |
American Indian | 1 | 41 |
Demographics Comparison: Manhattan vs Hollister
- In Hollister, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 16% compared to 0% in Manhattan.
- Manhattan has a higher percentage of White residents at 94% compared to 21% in Hollister.
- In Hollister, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 0% in Manhattan.
- Hollister has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 4%, compared to 2% in Manhattan.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Hollister at 13%, compared to 3% in Manhattan.
- In Hollister, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 41%, compared to 1% in Manhattan.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Manhattan | Hollister |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 14.4% | 21.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.0% | 18.1% |
Depression | 22.7% | 24.6% |
Smoking | 13.5% | 31.3% |
Binge Drinking | 24.2% | 14.9% |
Obesity | 24.2% | 44.9% |
Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 25.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Manhattan vs Hollister
- In Hollister, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.8% compared to 14.4% in Manhattan.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Hollister at 24.6% versus 22.7% in Manhattan.
- Hollister has a higher smoking rate at 31.3% compared to 13.5% in Manhattan.
- Binge drinking is more common in Manhattan at 24.2% compared to 14.9% in Hollister.
- Hollister has higher obesity rates at 44.9% compared to 24.2% in Manhattan.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Hollister at 25.0% compared to 12.0% in Manhattan.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Manhattan | Hollister |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 3.9% (33) |
High School Diploma | 15.3% (325) | 21.0% (178) |
Less than High School | 0.6% (12) | 12.3% (104) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.5% (392) | 10.7% (91) |
Education Levels Comparison: Manhattan vs Hollister
- In Hollister, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.9% compared to 0.0% in Manhattan.
- In Hollister, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.0% compared to 15.3% in Manhattan.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Hollister at 12.3%, compared to 0.6% in Manhattan.
- A higher percentage of residents in Manhattan hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.5% compared to 10.7% in Hollister.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.