Demographics details for Manhattan, MT vs Graysville, AL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Manhattan, MT vs Graysville, AL.
| Data | Manhattan | Graysville |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,120 | 1,885 |
| Median Age | 39.6 years | 44.3 years |
| Median Income | $57,045 | $65,671 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 70.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Manhattan vs Graysville
- In Manhattan, the population is higher at 2,120, compared to 1,885 in Graysville.
- The median age in Graysville is higher at 44.3 years, compared to 39.6 years in Manhattan.
- Graysville has a higher median income of $65,671, compared to $57,045 in Manhattan.
- In Graysville, the percentage of married families is higher at 70.0%, compared to 37.0% in Manhattan.
- Manhattan has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 0% in Graysville.
- The unemployment rate in Manhattan is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.5% in Graysville.
Demographics
Demographics Manhattan vs Graysville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Manhattan | Graysville |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 43 |
| White | 94 | 55 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 2 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 2 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Manhattan vs Graysville
- In Graysville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 43% compared to 0% in Manhattan.
- Manhattan has a higher percentage of White residents at 94% compared to 55% in Graysville.
- Both Manhattan and Graysville have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Manhattan at 2% compared to 0% in Graysville.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Manhattan at 3% compared to 2% in Graysville.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Manhattan at 1% compared to 0% in Graysville.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Manhattan | Graysville |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.4% | 19.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.0% | 13.0% |
| Depression | 22.7% | 24.8% |
| Smoking | 13.5% | 19.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 24.2% | 15.8% |
| Obesity | 24.2% | 38.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 30.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Manhattan vs Graysville
- In Graysville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.4% compared to 14.4% in Manhattan.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Graysville at 24.8% versus 22.7% in Manhattan.
- Graysville has a higher smoking rate at 19.6% compared to 13.5% in Manhattan.
- Binge drinking is more common in Manhattan at 24.2% compared to 15.8% in Graysville.
- Graysville has higher obesity rates at 38.9% compared to 24.2% in Manhattan.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Graysville at 30.0% compared to 12.0% in Manhattan.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Manhattan | Graysville |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 2.7% (50) |
| High School Diploma | 15.3% (325) | 30.4% (573) |
| Less than High School | 0.6% (12) | 29.8% (561) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.5% (392) | 22.8% (430) |
Education Levels Comparison: Manhattan vs Graysville
- In Graysville, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 0.0% in Manhattan.
- In Graysville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 30.4% compared to 15.3% in Manhattan.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Graysville at 29.8%, compared to 0.6% in Manhattan.
- In Graysville, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.8% compared to 18.5% in Manhattan.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.