Demographics details for Manhattan, MT vs Fort morgan, CO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Manhattan, MT vs Fort morgan, CO.
Data | Manhattan | Fort morgan |
---|---|---|
Population | 2,120 | 11,453 |
Median Age | 39.6 years | 32.8 years |
Median Income | $57,045 | $55,407 |
Married Families | 37.0% | 39.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 11% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Manhattan vs Fort morgan
- The population in Fort morgan is higher at 11,453, compared to 2,120 in Manhattan.
- Residents in Manhattan have a higher median age of 39.6 years compared to 32.8 years in Fort morgan.
- Manhattan has a higher median income of $57,045 compared to $55,407 in Fort morgan.
- In Fort morgan, the percentage of married families is higher at 39.0%, compared to 37.0% in Manhattan.
- The poverty level is higher in Fort morgan at 11%, compared to 10% in Manhattan.
- The unemployment rate in Manhattan is higher at 4.2%, compared to 2.5% in Fort morgan.
Demographics
Demographics Manhattan vs Fort morgan provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Manhattan | Fort morgan |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 8 |
White | 94 | 16 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 2 | 49 |
Two or More Races | 3 | 23 |
American Indian | 1 | 4 |
Demographics Comparison: Manhattan vs Fort morgan
- In Fort morgan, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 8% compared to 0% in Manhattan.
- Manhattan has a higher percentage of White residents at 94% compared to 16% in Fort morgan.
- Both Manhattan and Fort morgan have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Fort morgan has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 49%, compared to 2% in Manhattan.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Fort morgan at 23%, compared to 3% in Manhattan.
- In Fort morgan, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 4%, compared to 1% in Manhattan.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Manhattan | Fort morgan |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 14.4% | 17.0% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.0% | 13.5% |
Depression | 22.7% | 21.7% |
Smoking | 13.5% | 18.7% |
Binge Drinking | 24.2% | 17.6% |
Obesity | 24.2% | 29.3% |
Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Manhattan vs Fort morgan
- In Fort morgan, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.0% compared to 14.4% in Manhattan.
- Depression is more prevalent in Manhattan at 22.7% compared to 21.7% in Fort morgan.
- Fort morgan has a higher smoking rate at 18.7% compared to 13.5% in Manhattan.
- Binge drinking is more common in Manhattan at 24.2% compared to 17.6% in Fort morgan.
- Fort morgan has higher obesity rates at 29.3% compared to 24.2% in Manhattan.
- Disability percentages are higher in Manhattan at 12.0% compared to 9.0% in Fort morgan.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Manhattan | Fort morgan |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 4.3% (496) |
High School Diploma | 15.3% (325) | 16.0% (1,831) |
Less than High School | 0.6% (12) | 25.8% (2,957) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.5% (392) | 11.5% (1,312) |
Education Levels Comparison: Manhattan vs Fort morgan
- In Fort morgan, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 4.3% compared to 0.0% in Manhattan.
- In Fort morgan, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.0% compared to 15.3% in Manhattan.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fort morgan at 25.8%, compared to 0.6% in Manhattan.
- A higher percentage of residents in Manhattan hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.5% compared to 11.5% in Fort morgan.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.