Demographics details for Manhattan, MT vs Fort atkinson, WI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Manhattan, MT vs Fort atkinson, WI.
Data | Manhattan | Fort atkinson |
---|---|---|
Population | 2,120 | 12,412 |
Median Age | 39.6 years | 42.0 years |
Median Income | $57,045 | $72,215 |
Married Families | 37.0% | 41.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 9% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Manhattan vs Fort atkinson
- The population in Fort atkinson is higher at 12,412, compared to 2,120 in Manhattan.
- The median age in Fort atkinson is higher at 42.0 years, compared to 39.6 years in Manhattan.
- Fort atkinson has a higher median income of $72,215, compared to $57,045 in Manhattan.
- In Fort atkinson, the percentage of married families is higher at 41.0%, compared to 37.0% in Manhattan.
- Manhattan has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 9% in Fort atkinson.
- The unemployment rate in Manhattan is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.2% in Fort atkinson.
Demographics
Demographics Manhattan vs Fort atkinson provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Manhattan | Fort atkinson |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | Data is updating |
White | 94 | 89 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 2 | 8 |
Two or More Races | 3 | 3 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Manhattan vs Fort atkinson
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Manhattan and Fort atkinson at 0%.
- Manhattan has a higher percentage of White residents at 94% compared to 89% in Fort atkinson.
- Both Manhattan and Fort atkinson have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Fort atkinson has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 8%, compared to 2% in Manhattan.
- Both Manhattan and Fort atkinson have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 3%.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Manhattan at 1% compared to 0% in Fort atkinson.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Manhattan | Fort atkinson |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 14.4% | 15.2% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.0% | 10.2% |
Depression | 22.7% | 23.6% |
Smoking | 13.5% | 16.0% |
Binge Drinking | 24.2% | 23.5% |
Obesity | 24.2% | 34.0% |
Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Manhattan vs Fort atkinson
- In Fort atkinson, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.2% compared to 14.4% in Manhattan.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Fort atkinson at 23.6% versus 22.7% in Manhattan.
- Fort atkinson has a higher smoking rate at 16.0% compared to 13.5% in Manhattan.
- Binge drinking is more common in Manhattan at 24.2% compared to 23.5% in Fort atkinson.
- Fort atkinson has higher obesity rates at 34.0% compared to 24.2% in Manhattan.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Manhattan and Fort atkinson at 12.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Manhattan | Fort atkinson |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 1.3% (160) |
High School Diploma | 15.3% (325) | 20.8% (2,578) |
Less than High School | 0.6% (12) | 12.9% (1,595) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.5% (392) | 19.6% (2,436) |
Education Levels Comparison: Manhattan vs Fort atkinson
- In Fort atkinson, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.0% in Manhattan.
- In Fort atkinson, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 20.8% compared to 15.3% in Manhattan.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fort atkinson at 12.9%, compared to 0.6% in Manhattan.
- In Fort atkinson, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.6% compared to 18.5% in Manhattan.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.