Demographics details for Manhattan, KS vs Troy, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Manhattan, KS vs Troy, OH.
Data | Manhattan | Troy |
---|---|---|
Population | 53,829 | 26,679 |
Median Age | 24.7 years | 38.2 years |
Median Income | $55,316 | $69,730 |
Married Families | 29.0% | 41.0% |
Poverty Level | 15% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.8 | 4.6 |
Population Comparison: Manhattan vs Troy
- In Manhattan, the population is higher at 53,829, compared to 26,679 in Troy.
- The median age in Troy is higher at 38.2 years, compared to 24.7 years in Manhattan.
- Troy has a higher median income of $69,730, compared to $55,316 in Manhattan.
- In Troy, the percentage of married families is higher at 41.0%, compared to 29.0% in Manhattan.
- Manhattan has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 10% in Troy.
- Troy has a higher unemployment rate at 4.6% compared to 3.8% in Manhattan.
Demographics
Demographics Manhattan vs Troy provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Manhattan | Troy |
---|---|---|
Black | 5 | 3 |
White | 74 | 83 |
Asian | 5 | 5 |
Hispanic | 8 | 3 |
Two or More Races | 7 | 6 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Manhattan vs Troy
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Manhattan at 5% compared to 3% in Troy.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Troy at 83% compared to 74% in Manhattan.
- Both Manhattan and Troy have the same percentage of Asian residents at 5%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Manhattan at 8% compared to 3% in Troy.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Manhattan at 7% compared to 6% in Troy.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Manhattan at 1% compared to 0% in Troy.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Manhattan | Troy |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.7% | 17.2% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.1% | 11.6% |
Depression | 20.2% | 22.5% |
Smoking | 16.0% | 19.6% |
Binge Drinking | 20.6% | 17.6% |
Obesity | 32.2% | 39.9% |
Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Manhattan vs Troy
- In Troy, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.2% compared to 15.7% in Manhattan.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Troy at 22.5% versus 20.2% in Manhattan.
- Troy has a higher smoking rate at 19.6% compared to 16.0% in Manhattan.
- Binge drinking is more common in Manhattan at 20.6% compared to 17.6% in Troy.
- Troy has higher obesity rates at 39.9% compared to 32.2% in Manhattan.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Manhattan and Troy at 12.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Manhattan | Troy |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.5% (256) | 0.4% (107) |
High School Diploma | 5.8% (3,138) | 18.8% (5,006) |
Less than High School | 4.2% (2,256) | 9.8% (2,620) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 26.0% (14,017) | 20.6% (5,490) |
Education Levels Comparison: Manhattan vs Troy
- A higher percentage of residents in Manhattan have no formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.4% in Troy.
- In Troy, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.8% compared to 5.8% in Manhattan.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Troy at 9.8%, compared to 4.2% in Manhattan.
- A higher percentage of residents in Manhattan hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.0% compared to 20.6% in Troy.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.