Demographics details for Manhattan, KS vs Tavares, FL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Manhattan, KS vs Tavares, FL.
| Data | Manhattan | Tavares |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 53,829 | 20,372 |
| Median Age | 24.7 years | 54.6 years |
| Median Income | $55,316 | $54,271 |
| Married Families | 29.0% | 43.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.8 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Manhattan vs Tavares
- In Manhattan, the population is higher at 53,829, compared to 20,372 in Tavares.
- The median age in Tavares is higher at 54.6 years, compared to 24.7 years in Manhattan.
- Manhattan has a higher median income of $55,316 compared to $54,271 in Tavares.
- In Tavares, the percentage of married families is higher at 43.0%, compared to 29.0% in Manhattan.
- Manhattan has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 10% in Tavares.
- Tavares has a higher unemployment rate at 4.0% compared to 3.8% in Manhattan.
Demographics
Demographics Manhattan vs Tavares provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Manhattan | Tavares |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | 10 |
| White | 74 | 71 |
| Asian | 5 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 8 | 11 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 6 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Manhattan vs Tavares
- In Tavares, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 10% compared to 5% in Manhattan.
- Manhattan has a higher percentage of White residents at 74% compared to 71% in Tavares.
- The Asian population is larger in Manhattan at 5% compared to 2% in Tavares.
- Tavares has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 11%, compared to 8% in Manhattan.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Manhattan at 7% compared to 6% in Tavares.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Manhattan at 1% compared to 0% in Tavares.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Manhattan | Tavares |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.7% | 17.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.1% | 11.6% |
| Depression | 20.2% | 21.0% |
| Smoking | 16.0% | 21.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.6% | 16.1% |
| Obesity | 32.2% | 36.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Manhattan vs Tavares
- In Tavares, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.0% compared to 15.7% in Manhattan.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Tavares at 21.0% versus 20.2% in Manhattan.
- Tavares has a higher smoking rate at 21.6% compared to 16.0% in Manhattan.
- Binge drinking is more common in Manhattan at 20.6% compared to 16.1% in Tavares.
- Tavares has higher obesity rates at 36.5% compared to 32.2% in Manhattan.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Tavares at 18.0% compared to 12.0% in Manhattan.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Manhattan | Tavares |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (256) | 0.6% (125) |
| High School Diploma | 5.8% (3,138) | 17.0% (3,458) |
| Less than High School | 4.2% (2,256) | 16.9% (3,444) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 26.0% (14,017) | 17.0% (3,457) |
Education Levels Comparison: Manhattan vs Tavares
- In Tavares, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.5% in Manhattan.
- In Tavares, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.0% compared to 5.8% in Manhattan.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Tavares at 16.9%, compared to 4.2% in Manhattan.
- A higher percentage of residents in Manhattan hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.0% compared to 17.0% in Tavares.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.