Demographics details for Manhattan, KS vs Laurelville, OH

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Manhattan, KS vs Laurelville, OH.

Data Manhattan Laurelville
Population 53,829 506
Median Age 24.7 years 36.1 years
Median Income $55,316 $50,357
Married Families 29.0% 41.0%
Poverty Level 15% 12%
Unemployment Rate 3.8 3.5

Population Comparison: Manhattan vs Laurelville

  • In Manhattan, the population is higher at 53,829, compared to 506 in Laurelville.
  • The median age in Laurelville is higher at 36.1 years, compared to 24.7 years in Manhattan.
  • Manhattan has a higher median income of $55,316 compared to $50,357 in Laurelville.
  • In Laurelville, the percentage of married families is higher at 41.0%, compared to 29.0% in Manhattan.
  • Manhattan has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 12% in Laurelville.
  • The unemployment rate in Manhattan is higher at 3.8%, compared to 3.5% in Laurelville.

Demographics

Demographics Manhattan vs Laurelville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Manhattan Laurelville
Black 5 Data is updating
White 74 88
Asian 5 Data is updating
Hispanic 8 Data is updating
Two or More Races 7 12
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Manhattan vs Laurelville

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Manhattan at 5% compared to 0% in Laurelville.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Laurelville at 88% compared to 74% in Manhattan.
  • The Asian population is larger in Manhattan at 5% compared to 0% in Laurelville.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Manhattan at 8% compared to 0% in Laurelville.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Laurelville at 12%, compared to 7% in Manhattan.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Manhattan at 1% compared to 0% in Laurelville.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Manhattan Laurelville
Mental Health Not Good 15.7% 20.7%
Physical Health Not Good 10.1% 14.8%
Depression 20.2% 26.8%
Smoking 16.0% 27.9%
Binge Drinking 20.6% 17.0%
Obesity 32.2% 45.9%
Disability Percentage 12.0% 20.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Manhattan vs Laurelville

  • In Laurelville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.7% compared to 15.7% in Manhattan.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Laurelville at 26.8% versus 20.2% in Manhattan.
  • Laurelville has a higher smoking rate at 27.9% compared to 16.0% in Manhattan.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Manhattan at 20.6% compared to 17.0% in Laurelville.
  • Laurelville has higher obesity rates at 45.9% compared to 32.2% in Manhattan.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Laurelville at 20.0% compared to 12.0% in Manhattan.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Manhattan Laurelville
No Schooling 0.5% (256) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 5.8% (3,138) 41.5% (210)
Less than High School 4.2% (2,256) 18.2% (92)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 26.0% (14,017) 2.8% (14)

Education Levels Comparison: Manhattan vs Laurelville

  • A higher percentage of residents in Manhattan have no formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.0% in Laurelville.
  • In Laurelville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 41.5% compared to 5.8% in Manhattan.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Laurelville at 18.2%, compared to 4.2% in Manhattan.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Manhattan hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.0% compared to 2.8% in Laurelville.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.