Demographics details for Manchester, NH vs Roanoke rapids, NC

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Manchester, NH vs Roanoke rapids, NC.

Data Manchester Roanoke rapids
Population 115,141 14,856
Median Age 37.0 years 40.5 years
Median Income $74,040 $45,732
Married Families 34.0% 34.0%
Poverty Level 10% 18%
Unemployment Rate 2.6 5.8

Population Comparison: Manchester vs Roanoke rapids

  • In Manchester, the population is higher at 115,141, compared to 14,856 in Roanoke rapids.
  • The median age in Roanoke rapids is higher at 40.5 years, compared to 37.0 years in Manchester.
  • Manchester has a higher median income of $74,040 compared to $45,732 in Roanoke rapids.
  • The percentage of married families is the same in both Manchester and Roanoke rapids at 34.0%.
  • The poverty level is higher in Roanoke rapids at 18%, compared to 10% in Manchester.
  • Roanoke rapids has a higher unemployment rate at 5.8% compared to 2.6% in Manchester.

Demographics

Demographics Manchester vs Roanoke rapids provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Manchester Roanoke rapids
Black 6 35
White 68 50
Asian 5 1
Hispanic 12 6
Two or More Races 9 7
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Manchester vs Roanoke rapids

  • In Roanoke rapids, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 35% compared to 6% in Manchester.
  • Manchester has a higher percentage of White residents at 68% compared to 50% in Roanoke rapids.
  • The Asian population is larger in Manchester at 5% compared to 1% in Roanoke rapids.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Manchester at 12% compared to 6% in Roanoke rapids.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Manchester at 9% compared to 7% in Roanoke rapids.
  • In Roanoke rapids, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Manchester.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Manchester Roanoke rapids
Mental Health Not Good 16.4% 18.5%
Physical Health Not Good 10.5% 13.6%
Depression 24.5% 24.6%
Smoking 17.3% 21.4%
Binge Drinking 14.6% 15.1%
Obesity 35.9% 39.1%
Disability Percentage 14.0% 20.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Manchester vs Roanoke rapids

  • In Roanoke rapids, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.5% compared to 16.4% in Manchester.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Roanoke rapids at 24.6% versus 24.5% in Manchester.
  • Roanoke rapids has a higher smoking rate at 21.4% compared to 17.3% in Manchester.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Roanoke rapids at 15.1% compared to 14.6% in Manchester.
  • Roanoke rapids has higher obesity rates at 39.1% compared to 35.9% in Manchester.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Roanoke rapids at 20.0% compared to 14.0% in Manchester.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Manchester Roanoke rapids
No Schooling 1.1% (1,316) 0.6% (93)
High School Diploma 17.0% (19,519) 20.5% (3,040)
Less than High School 15.1% (17,348) 14.5% (2,156)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 23.1% (26,548) 15.7% (2,326)

Education Levels Comparison: Manchester vs Roanoke rapids

  • A higher percentage of residents in Manchester have no formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.6% in Roanoke rapids.
  • In Roanoke rapids, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 20.5% compared to 17.0% in Manchester.
  • More residents in Manchester have less than a high school education at 15.1% compared to 14.5% in Roanoke rapids.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Manchester hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.1% compared to 15.7% in Roanoke rapids.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.