Demographics details for Manchester, NH vs Lake havasu city, AZ

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Manchester, NH vs Lake havasu city, AZ.

Data Manchester Lake havasu city
Population 115,141 58,926
Median Age 37.0 years 54.3 years
Median Income $74,040 $64,027
Married Families 34.0% 46.0%
Poverty Level 10% 11%
Unemployment Rate 2.6 4.1

Population Comparison: Manchester vs Lake havasu city

  • In Manchester, the population is higher at 115,141, compared to 58,926 in Lake havasu city.
  • The median age in Lake havasu city is higher at 54.3 years, compared to 37.0 years in Manchester.
  • Manchester has a higher median income of $74,040 compared to $64,027 in Lake havasu city.
  • In Lake havasu city, the percentage of married families is higher at 46.0%, compared to 34.0% in Manchester.
  • The poverty level is higher in Lake havasu city at 11%, compared to 10% in Manchester.
  • Lake havasu city has a higher unemployment rate at 4.1% compared to 2.6% in Manchester.

Demographics

Demographics Manchester vs Lake havasu city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Manchester Lake havasu city
Black 6 Data is updating
White 68 75
Asian 5 1
Hispanic 12 15
Two or More Races 9 8
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Manchester vs Lake havasu city

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Manchester at 6% compared to 0% in Lake havasu city.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Lake havasu city at 75% compared to 68% in Manchester.
  • The Asian population is larger in Manchester at 5% compared to 1% in Lake havasu city.
  • Lake havasu city has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 15%, compared to 12% in Manchester.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Manchester at 9% compared to 8% in Lake havasu city.
  • In Lake havasu city, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Manchester.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Manchester Lake havasu city
Mental Health Not Good 16.4% 17.5%
Physical Health Not Good 10.5% 11.7%
Depression 24.5% 20.6%
Smoking 17.3% 18.0%
Binge Drinking 14.6% 19.2%
Obesity 35.9% 33.6%
Disability Percentage 14.0% 18.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Manchester vs Lake havasu city

  • In Lake havasu city, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.5% compared to 16.4% in Manchester.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Manchester at 24.5% compared to 20.6% in Lake havasu city.
  • Lake havasu city has a higher smoking rate at 18.0% compared to 17.3% in Manchester.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Lake havasu city at 19.2% compared to 14.6% in Manchester.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Manchester at 35.9% compared to 33.6% in Lake havasu city.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Lake havasu city at 18.0% compared to 14.0% in Manchester.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Manchester Lake havasu city
No Schooling 1.1% (1,316) 1.1% (664)
High School Diploma 17.0% (19,519) 20.8% (12,284)
Less than High School 15.1% (17,348) 12.8% (7,543)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 23.1% (26,548) 14.2% (8,359)

Education Levels Comparison: Manchester vs Lake havasu city

  • The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Manchester and Lake havasu city at 1.1%.
  • In Lake havasu city, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 20.8% compared to 17.0% in Manchester.
  • More residents in Manchester have less than a high school education at 15.1% compared to 12.8% in Lake havasu city.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Manchester hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.1% compared to 14.2% in Lake havasu city.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.