Demographics details for Manchester, NH vs Cochran, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Manchester, NH vs Cochran, GA.
| Data | Manchester | Cochran |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 115,141 | 4,647 |
| Median Age | 37.0 years | 28.9 years |
| Median Income | $74,040 | $31,326 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 25.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 19% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.6 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Manchester vs Cochran
- In Manchester, the population is higher at 115,141, compared to 4,647 in Cochran.
- Residents in Manchester have a higher median age of 37.0 years compared to 28.9 years in Cochran.
- Manchester has a higher median income of $74,040 compared to $31,326 in Cochran.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Manchester at 34.0% compared to 25.0% in Cochran.
- The poverty level is higher in Cochran at 19%, compared to 10% in Manchester.
- Cochran has a higher unemployment rate at 3.2% compared to 2.6% in Manchester.
Demographics
Demographics Manchester vs Cochran provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Manchester | Cochran |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 6 | 53 |
| White | 68 | 40 |
| Asian | 5 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 12 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Manchester vs Cochran
- In Cochran, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 53% compared to 6% in Manchester.
- Manchester has a higher percentage of White residents at 68% compared to 40% in Cochran.
- The Asian population is larger in Manchester at 5% compared to 2% in Cochran.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Manchester at 12% compared to 2% in Cochran.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Manchester at 9% compared to 3% in Cochran.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Manchester and Cochran at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Manchester | Cochran |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.4% | 18.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.5% | 13.7% |
| Depression | 24.5% | 21.8% |
| Smoking | 17.3% | 20.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.6% | 13.6% |
| Obesity | 35.9% | 38.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Manchester vs Cochran
- In Cochran, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 16.4% in Manchester.
- Depression is more prevalent in Manchester at 24.5% compared to 21.8% in Cochran.
- Cochran has a higher smoking rate at 20.0% compared to 17.3% in Manchester.
- Binge drinking is more common in Manchester at 14.6% compared to 13.6% in Cochran.
- Cochran has higher obesity rates at 38.5% compared to 35.9% in Manchester.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Cochran at 16.0% compared to 14.0% in Manchester.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Manchester | Cochran |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.1% (1,316) | 1.2% (54) |
| High School Diploma | 17.0% (19,519) | 12.2% (569) |
| Less than High School | 15.1% (17,348) | 15.1% (703) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 23.1% (26,548) | 12.7% (592) |
Education Levels Comparison: Manchester vs Cochran
- In Cochran, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 1.1% in Manchester.
- A higher percentage of residents in Manchester hold a high school diploma at 17.0% compared to 12.2% in Cochran.
- Both cities report the same percentage of residents with less than a high school education at 15.1%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Manchester hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.1% compared to 12.7% in Cochran.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.