Demographics details for Manassas, VA vs Jurupa valley, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Manassas, VA vs Jurupa valley, CA.
| Data | Manassas | Jurupa valley |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 42,642 | 107,609 |
| Median Age | 35.1 years | 33.5 years |
| Median Income | $110,559 | $91,562 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | 7% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.7 | 4.9 |
Population Comparison: Manassas vs Jurupa valley
- The population in Jurupa valley is higher at 107,609, compared to 42,642 in Manassas.
- Residents in Manassas have a higher median age of 35.1 years compared to 33.5 years in Jurupa valley.
- Manassas has a higher median income of $110,559 compared to $91,562 in Jurupa valley.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Manassas at 38.0% compared to 34.0% in Jurupa valley.
- The poverty level is higher in Jurupa valley at 12%, compared to 7% in Manassas.
- Jurupa valley has a higher unemployment rate at 4.9% compared to 2.7% in Manassas.
Demographics
Demographics Manassas vs Jurupa valley provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Manassas | Jurupa valley |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 13 | 3 |
| White | 23 | 8 |
| Asian | 6 | 4 |
| Hispanic | 39 | 71 |
| Two or More Races | 18 | 13 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Manassas vs Jurupa valley
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Manassas at 13% compared to 3% in Jurupa valley.
- Manassas has a higher percentage of White residents at 23% compared to 8% in Jurupa valley.
- The Asian population is larger in Manassas at 6% compared to 4% in Jurupa valley.
- Jurupa valley has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 71%, compared to 39% in Manassas.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Manassas at 18% compared to 13% in Jurupa valley.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Manassas and Jurupa valley at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Manassas | Jurupa valley |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.4% | 16.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.5% | 13.3% |
| Depression | 20.8% | 17.4% |
| Smoking | 14.7% | 14.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.8% | 16.1% |
| Obesity | 34.8% | 38.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Manassas vs Jurupa valley
- In Jurupa valley, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.7% compared to 15.4% in Manassas.
- Depression is more prevalent in Manassas at 20.8% compared to 17.4% in Jurupa valley.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Manassas at 14.7% compared to 14.6% in Jurupa valley.
- Binge drinking is more common in Manassas at 16.8% compared to 16.1% in Jurupa valley.
- Jurupa valley has higher obesity rates at 38.4% compared to 34.8% in Manassas.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Jurupa valley at 9.0% compared to 8.0% in Manassas.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Manassas | Jurupa valley |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 3.0% (1,266) | 3.1% (3,376) |
| High School Diploma | 15.8% (6,749) | 17.3% (18,582) |
| Less than High School | 17.4% (7,427) | 34.3% (36,892) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 22.4% (9,563) | 9.0% (9,706) |
Education Levels Comparison: Manassas vs Jurupa valley
- In Jurupa valley, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.1% compared to 3.0% in Manassas.
- In Jurupa valley, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.3% compared to 15.8% in Manassas.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Jurupa valley at 34.3%, compared to 17.4% in Manassas.
- A higher percentage of residents in Manassas hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.4% compared to 9.0% in Jurupa valley.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.