Demographics details for Manassas park, VA vs Waipahu, HI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Manassas park, VA vs Waipahu, HI.
| Data | Manassas park | Waipahu |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 16,703 | 39,873 |
| Median Age | 35.8 years | 39.6 years |
| Median Income | $91,673 | $87,961 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.7 | 4.6 |
Population Comparison: Manassas park vs Waipahu
- The population in Waipahu is higher at 39,873, compared to 16,703 in Manassas park.
- The median age in Waipahu is higher at 39.6 years, compared to 35.8 years in Manassas park.
- Manassas park has a higher median income of $91,673 compared to $87,961 in Waipahu.
- In Waipahu, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 35.0% in Manassas park.
- The poverty level is higher in Waipahu at 10%, compared to 9% in Manassas park.
- Waipahu has a higher unemployment rate at 4.6% compared to 2.7% in Manassas park.
Demographics
Demographics Manassas park vs Waipahu provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Manassas park | Waipahu |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 15 | 1 |
| White | 16 | 11 |
| Asian | 11 | 67 |
| Hispanic | 43 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 12 | 15 |
| American Indian | 3 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Manassas park vs Waipahu
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Manassas park at 15% compared to 1% in Waipahu.
- Manassas park has a higher percentage of White residents at 16% compared to 11% in Waipahu.
- In Waipahu, the Asian population stands at 67%, greater than 11% in Manassas park.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Manassas park at 43% compared to 6% in Waipahu.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Waipahu at 15%, compared to 12% in Manassas park.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Manassas park at 3% compared to 0% in Waipahu.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Manassas park | Waipahu |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.4% | 12.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.7% | 8.3% |
| Depression | 20.0% | 10.2% |
| Smoking | 14.6% | 12.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.7% | 14.8% |
| Obesity | 36.6% | 22.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Manassas park vs Waipahu
- More residents in Manassas park report poor mental health at 15.4% compared to 12.7% in Waipahu.
- Depression is more prevalent in Manassas park at 20.0% compared to 10.2% in Waipahu.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Manassas park at 14.6% compared to 12.9% in Waipahu.
- Binge drinking is more common in Manassas park at 16.7% compared to 14.8% in Waipahu.
- Obesity rates are higher in Manassas park at 36.6% compared to 22.4% in Waipahu.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Waipahu at 14.0% compared to 9.0% in Manassas park.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Manassas park | Waipahu |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 6.2% (1,032) | 1.8% (729) |
| High School Diploma | 18.3% (3,054) | 22.1% (8,831) |
| Less than High School | 25.9% (4,321) | 11.0% (4,392) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.0% (2,847) | 13.0% (5,195) |
Education Levels Comparison: Manassas park vs Waipahu
- A higher percentage of residents in Manassas park have no formal schooling at 6.2% compared to 1.8% in Waipahu.
- In Waipahu, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.1% compared to 18.3% in Manassas park.
- More residents in Manassas park have less than a high school education at 25.9% compared to 11.0% in Waipahu.
- A higher percentage of residents in Manassas park hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.0% compared to 13.0% in Waipahu.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.