Demographics details for Manassas park, VA vs Keiser, AR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Manassas park, VA vs Keiser, AR.
Data | Manassas park | Keiser |
---|---|---|
Population | 16,703 | 713 |
Median Age | 35.8 years | 41.6 years |
Median Income | $91,673 | $50,136 |
Married Families | 35.0% | 35.0% |
Poverty Level | 9% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 2.7 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Manassas park vs Keiser
- In Manassas park, the population is higher at 16,703, compared to 713 in Keiser.
- The median age in Keiser is higher at 41.6 years, compared to 35.8 years in Manassas park.
- Manassas park has a higher median income of $91,673 compared to $50,136 in Keiser.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both Manassas park and Keiser at 35.0%.
- The poverty level is higher in Keiser at 12%, compared to 9% in Manassas park.
- Keiser has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 2.7% in Manassas park.
Demographics
Demographics Manassas park vs Keiser provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Manassas park | Keiser |
---|---|---|
Black | 15 | 4 |
White | 16 | 83 |
Asian | 11 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 43 | 1 |
Two or More Races | 12 | 12 |
American Indian | 3 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Manassas park vs Keiser
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Manassas park at 15% compared to 4% in Keiser.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Keiser at 83% compared to 16% in Manassas park.
- The Asian population is larger in Manassas park at 11% compared to 0% in Keiser.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Manassas park at 43% compared to 1% in Keiser.
- Both Manassas park and Keiser have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 12%.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Manassas park at 3% compared to 0% in Keiser.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Manassas park | Keiser |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.4% | 20.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.7% | 14.6% |
Depression | 20.0% | 28.9% |
Smoking | 14.6% | 24.9% |
Binge Drinking | 16.7% | 15.2% |
Obesity | 36.6% | 34.9% |
Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 27.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Manassas park vs Keiser
- In Keiser, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.3% compared to 15.4% in Manassas park.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Keiser at 28.9% versus 20.0% in Manassas park.
- Keiser has a higher smoking rate at 24.9% compared to 14.6% in Manassas park.
- Binge drinking is more common in Manassas park at 16.7% compared to 15.2% in Keiser.
- Obesity rates are higher in Manassas park at 36.6% compared to 34.9% in Keiser.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Keiser at 27.0% compared to 9.0% in Manassas park.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Manassas park | Keiser |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 6.2% (1,032) | 6.2% (44) |
High School Diploma | 18.3% (3,054) | 15.0% (107) |
Less than High School | 25.9% (4,321) | 55.5% (396) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.0% (2,847) | 7.3% (52) |
Education Levels Comparison: Manassas park vs Keiser
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Manassas park and Keiser at 6.2%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Manassas park hold a high school diploma at 18.3% compared to 15.0% in Keiser.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Keiser at 55.5%, compared to 25.9% in Manassas park.
- A higher percentage of residents in Manassas park hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.0% compared to 7.3% in Keiser.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.