Demographics details for Manassas park, VA vs Clayton, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Manassas park, VA vs Clayton, OH.
| Data | Manassas park | Clayton |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 16,703 | 13,235 |
| Median Age | 35.8 years | 46.0 years |
| Median Income | $91,673 | $89,282 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 47.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.7 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Manassas park vs Clayton
- In Manassas park, the population is higher at 16,703, compared to 13,235 in Clayton.
- The median age in Clayton is higher at 46.0 years, compared to 35.8 years in Manassas park.
- Manassas park has a higher median income of $91,673 compared to $89,282 in Clayton.
- In Clayton, the percentage of married families is higher at 47.0%, compared to 35.0% in Manassas park.
- The poverty level is higher in Clayton at 10%, compared to 9% in Manassas park.
- Clayton has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 2.7% in Manassas park.
Demographics
Demographics Manassas park vs Clayton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Manassas park | Clayton |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 15 | 30 |
| White | 16 | 61 |
| Asian | 11 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 43 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 12 | 5 |
| American Indian | 3 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Manassas park vs Clayton
- In Clayton, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 30% compared to 15% in Manassas park.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Clayton at 61% compared to 16% in Manassas park.
- The Asian population is larger in Manassas park at 11% compared to 2% in Clayton.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Manassas park at 43% compared to 2% in Clayton.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Manassas park at 12% compared to 5% in Clayton.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Manassas park at 3% compared to 0% in Clayton.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Manassas park | Clayton |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.4% | 16.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.7% | 10.3% |
| Depression | 20.0% | 24.4% |
| Smoking | 14.6% | 15.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.7% | 18.9% |
| Obesity | 36.6% | 37.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Manassas park vs Clayton
- In Clayton, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.8% compared to 15.4% in Manassas park.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Clayton at 24.4% versus 20.0% in Manassas park.
- Clayton has a higher smoking rate at 15.3% compared to 14.6% in Manassas park.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Clayton at 18.9% compared to 16.7% in Manassas park.
- Clayton has higher obesity rates at 37.4% compared to 36.6% in Manassas park.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Clayton at 13.0% compared to 9.0% in Manassas park.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Manassas park | Clayton |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 6.2% (1,032) | 0.2% (30) |
| High School Diploma | 18.3% (3,054) | 17.9% (2,371) |
| Less than High School | 25.9% (4,321) | 5.6% (746) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.0% (2,847) | 26.3% (3,484) |
Education Levels Comparison: Manassas park vs Clayton
- A higher percentage of residents in Manassas park have no formal schooling at 6.2% compared to 0.2% in Clayton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Manassas park hold a high school diploma at 18.3% compared to 17.9% in Clayton.
- More residents in Manassas park have less than a high school education at 25.9% compared to 5.6% in Clayton.
- In Clayton, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.3% compared to 17.0% in Manassas park.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.