Environment details: Malta MT
water quality is good with minimal issues.
Environment details: Crawford NE
Water quality poor; agricultural runoff problems.
Compare Environment: Malta MT vs Crawford NE
Environmental and Climate Insights
Understanding environmental and climate factors is crucial for assessing the sustainability and livability of a city or town. Key metrics such as CO2 emissions, water quality, and air quality indices provide valuable insights into the local environmental conditions. Evaluating these factors helps in making informed decisions about living and investing in a community.
| Metric | Malta | Crawford |
|---|---|---|
| CO2 Emissions | 228 | 378 |
| Water Quality | 7/10 | 3/10 |
| Water Quality Explanation | water quality is good with minimal issues. | Water quality poor; agricultural runoff problems. |
| Median Air Quality | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Average Air Quality Index | 1.64 | 1.86 |
| Worst AQI | 5.0 | 4.0 |
| Days with Poor AQI | 16 | 33 |
Environmental Insights Comparison: Malta vs Crawford
- Water quality is rated higher in Malta at 7/10 compared to 3/10 in Crawford.
- Median air quality indexes are identical in both cities at 2.0.
- Air quality is better in Crawford with an average index of 1.86 compared to 1.64 in Malta.
- Crawford experiences more days with poor air quality at 33 compared to 16 in Malta.
Overview of the Place
Gaining a comprehensive understanding of a place is crucial for making informed decisions about living or investing there. Factors such as local culture, economic conditions, and community dynamics play a significant role in shaping the overall experience. For a quick understanding of the data behind this place, we recommend checking out the page.