Demographics details for Mahopac, NY vs Clearfield, UT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Mahopac, NY vs Clearfield, UT.
| Data | Mahopac | Clearfield |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 8,774 | 34,062 |
| Median Age | 43.6 years | 29.8 years |
| Median Income | $119,563 | $69,889 |
| Married Families | 50.0% | 37.0% |
| Poverty Level | 4% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.3 |
Population Comparison: Mahopac vs Clearfield
- The population in Clearfield is higher at 34,062, compared to 8,774 in Mahopac.
- Residents in Mahopac have a higher median age of 43.6 years compared to 29.8 years in Clearfield.
- Mahopac has a higher median income of $119,563 compared to $69,889 in Clearfield.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Mahopac at 50.0% compared to 37.0% in Clearfield.
- The poverty level is higher in Clearfield at 10%, compared to 4% in Mahopac.
- Clearfield has a higher unemployment rate at 4.3% compared to 3.5% in Mahopac.
Demographics
Demographics Mahopac vs Clearfield provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Mahopac | Clearfield |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 3 |
| White | 73 | 69 |
| Asian | 3 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 18 | 17 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 8 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Mahopac vs Clearfield
- In Clearfield, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 1% in Mahopac.
- Mahopac has a higher percentage of White residents at 73% compared to 69% in Clearfield.
- The Asian population is larger in Mahopac at 3% compared to 2% in Clearfield.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Mahopac at 18% compared to 17% in Clearfield.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Clearfield at 8%, compared to 5% in Mahopac.
- In Clearfield, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Mahopac.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Mahopac | Clearfield |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.8% | 17.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.5% | 11.7% |
| Depression | 19.3% | 24.6% |
| Smoking | 13.6% | 10.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.9% | 10.2% |
| Obesity | 28.3% | 36.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Mahopac vs Clearfield
- In Clearfield, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.4% compared to 13.8% in Mahopac.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Clearfield at 24.6% versus 19.3% in Mahopac.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Mahopac at 13.6% compared to 10.2% in Clearfield.
- Binge drinking is more common in Mahopac at 18.9% compared to 10.2% in Clearfield.
- Clearfield has higher obesity rates at 36.3% compared to 28.3% in Mahopac.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Mahopac and Clearfield at 12.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Mahopac | Clearfield |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.5% (221) | 0.6% (208) |
| High School Diploma | 17.0% (1,491) | 13.8% (4,690) |
| Less than High School | 9.0% (786) | 10.7% (3,633) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 30.1% (2,644) | 12.8% (4,366) |
Education Levels Comparison: Mahopac vs Clearfield
- A higher percentage of residents in Mahopac have no formal schooling at 2.5% compared to 0.6% in Clearfield.
- A higher percentage of residents in Mahopac hold a high school diploma at 17.0% compared to 13.8% in Clearfield.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Clearfield at 10.7%, compared to 9.0% in Mahopac.
- A higher percentage of residents in Mahopac hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.1% compared to 12.8% in Clearfield.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.