Demographics details for Mahopac, NY vs Auburn, AL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Mahopac, NY vs Auburn, AL.
Data | Mahopac | Auburn |
---|---|---|
Population | 8,774 | 80,006 |
Median Age | 43.6 years | 25.9 years |
Median Income | $119,563 | $55,509 |
Married Families | 50.0% | 32.0% |
Poverty Level | 4% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.0 |
Population Comparison: Mahopac vs Auburn
- The population in Auburn is higher at 80,006, compared to 8,774 in Mahopac.
- Residents in Mahopac have a higher median age of 43.6 years compared to 25.9 years in Auburn.
- Mahopac has a higher median income of $119,563 compared to $55,509 in Auburn.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Mahopac at 50.0% compared to 32.0% in Auburn.
- The poverty level is higher in Auburn at 10%, compared to 4% in Mahopac.
- The unemployment rate in Mahopac is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.0% in Auburn.
Demographics
Demographics Mahopac vs Auburn provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Mahopac | Auburn |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 17 |
White | 73 | 69 |
Asian | 3 | 8 |
Hispanic | 18 | 3 |
Two or More Races | 5 | 3 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Mahopac vs Auburn
- In Auburn, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 17% compared to 1% in Mahopac.
- Mahopac has a higher percentage of White residents at 73% compared to 69% in Auburn.
- In Auburn, the Asian population stands at 8%, greater than 3% in Mahopac.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Mahopac at 18% compared to 3% in Auburn.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Mahopac at 5% compared to 3% in Auburn.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Mahopac and Auburn at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Mahopac | Auburn |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 13.8% | 17.6% |
Physical Health Not Good | 8.5% | 12.0% |
Depression | 19.3% | 22.0% |
Smoking | 13.6% | 15.5% |
Binge Drinking | 18.9% | 14.5% |
Obesity | 28.3% | 38.7% |
Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Mahopac vs Auburn
- In Auburn, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.6% compared to 13.8% in Mahopac.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Auburn at 22.0% versus 19.3% in Mahopac.
- Auburn has a higher smoking rate at 15.5% compared to 13.6% in Mahopac.
- Binge drinking is more common in Mahopac at 18.9% compared to 14.5% in Auburn.
- Auburn has higher obesity rates at 38.7% compared to 28.3% in Mahopac.
- Disability percentages are higher in Mahopac at 12.0% compared to 8.0% in Auburn.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Mahopac | Auburn |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.5% (221) | 0.3% (236) |
High School Diploma | 17.0% (1,491) | 5.3% (4,206) |
Less than High School | 9.0% (786) | 2.5% (1,964) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 30.1% (2,644) | 30.7% (24,546) |
Education Levels Comparison: Mahopac vs Auburn
- A higher percentage of residents in Mahopac have no formal schooling at 2.5% compared to 0.3% in Auburn.
- A higher percentage of residents in Mahopac hold a high school diploma at 17.0% compared to 5.3% in Auburn.
- More residents in Mahopac have less than a high school education at 9.0% compared to 2.5% in Auburn.
- In Auburn, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.7% compared to 30.1% in Mahopac.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.