Demographics details for Madisonville, TX vs Falling waters, WV

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Madisonville, TX vs Falling waters, WV.

Data Madisonville Falling waters
Population 4,564 2,150
Median Age 38.2 years 32.2 years
Median Income $62,135 $84,038
Married Families 34.0% 29.0%
Poverty Level 15% 9%
Unemployment Rate 4.5 3.5

Population Comparison: Madisonville vs Falling waters

  • In Madisonville, the population is higher at 4,564, compared to 2,150 in Falling waters.
  • Residents in Madisonville have a higher median age of 38.2 years compared to 32.2 years in Falling waters.
  • Falling waters has a higher median income of $84,038, compared to $62,135 in Madisonville.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Madisonville at 34.0% compared to 29.0% in Falling waters.
  • Madisonville has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 9% in Falling waters.
  • The unemployment rate in Madisonville is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.5% in Falling waters.

Demographics

Demographics Madisonville vs Falling waters provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Madisonville Falling waters
Black 23 6
White 31 92
Asian 1 Data is updating
Hispanic 36 Data is updating
Two or More Races 9 2
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Madisonville vs Falling waters

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Madisonville at 23% compared to 6% in Falling waters.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Falling waters at 92% compared to 31% in Madisonville.
  • The Asian population is larger in Madisonville at 1% compared to 0% in Falling waters.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Madisonville at 36% compared to 0% in Falling waters.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Madisonville at 9% compared to 2% in Falling waters.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Madisonville and Falling waters at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Madisonville Falling waters
Mental Health Not Good 18.1% 18.5%
Physical Health Not Good 13.1% 11.9%
Depression 22.7% 25.7%
Smoking 18.8% 18.7%
Binge Drinking 16.7% 15.2%
Obesity 39.6% 37.6%
Disability Percentage 16.0% 24.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Madisonville vs Falling waters

  • In Falling waters, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.5% compared to 18.1% in Madisonville.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Falling waters at 25.7% versus 22.7% in Madisonville.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Madisonville at 18.8% compared to 18.7% in Falling waters.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Madisonville at 16.7% compared to 15.2% in Falling waters.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Madisonville at 39.6% compared to 37.6% in Falling waters.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Falling waters at 24.0% compared to 16.0% in Madisonville.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Madisonville Falling waters
No Schooling 2.3% (106) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 13.4% (610) 22.4% (482)
Less than High School 37.0% (1,690) 4.7% (102)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 8.6% (394) 11.0% (237)

Education Levels Comparison: Madisonville vs Falling waters

  • A higher percentage of residents in Madisonville have no formal schooling at 2.3% compared to 0.0% in Falling waters.
  • In Falling waters, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.4% compared to 13.4% in Madisonville.
  • More residents in Madisonville have less than a high school education at 37.0% compared to 4.7% in Falling waters.
  • In Falling waters, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.0% compared to 8.6% in Madisonville.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.