Demographics details for Madisonville, TX vs American fork, UT

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Madisonville, TX vs American fork, UT.

Data Madisonville American fork
Population 4,564 37,268
Median Age 38.2 years 28.0 years
Median Income $62,135 $90,490
Married Families 34.0% 42.0%
Poverty Level 15% 5%
Unemployment Rate 4.5 4.2

Population Comparison: Madisonville vs American fork

  • The population in American fork is higher at 37,268, compared to 4,564 in Madisonville.
  • Residents in Madisonville have a higher median age of 38.2 years compared to 28.0 years in American fork.
  • American fork has a higher median income of $90,490, compared to $62,135 in Madisonville.
  • In American fork, the percentage of married families is higher at 42.0%, compared to 34.0% in Madisonville.
  • Madisonville has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 5% in American fork.
  • The unemployment rate in Madisonville is higher at 4.5%, compared to 4.2% in American fork.

Demographics

Demographics Madisonville vs American fork provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Madisonville American fork
Black 23 Data is updating
White 31 84
Asian 1 1
Hispanic 36 9
Two or More Races 9 6
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Madisonville vs American fork

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Madisonville at 23% compared to 0% in American fork.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in American fork at 84% compared to 31% in Madisonville.
  • Both Madisonville and American fork have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Madisonville at 36% compared to 9% in American fork.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Madisonville at 9% compared to 6% in American fork.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Madisonville and American fork at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Madisonville American fork
Mental Health Not Good 18.1% 14.2%
Physical Health Not Good 13.1% 9.8%
Depression 22.7% 23.4%
Smoking 18.8% 6.7%
Binge Drinking 16.7% 8.5%
Obesity 39.6% 29.5%
Disability Percentage 16.0% 8.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Madisonville vs American fork

  • More residents in Madisonville report poor mental health at 18.1% compared to 14.2% in American fork.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in American fork at 23.4% versus 22.7% in Madisonville.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Madisonville at 18.8% compared to 6.7% in American fork.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Madisonville at 16.7% compared to 8.5% in American fork.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Madisonville at 39.6% compared to 29.5% in American fork.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Madisonville at 16.0% compared to 8.0% in American fork.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Madisonville American fork
No Schooling 2.3% (106) 0.6% (208)
High School Diploma 13.4% (610) 7.4% (2,742)
Less than High School 37.0% (1,690) 5.7% (2,134)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 8.6% (394) 21.3% (7,922)

Education Levels Comparison: Madisonville vs American fork

  • A higher percentage of residents in Madisonville have no formal schooling at 2.3% compared to 0.6% in American fork.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Madisonville hold a high school diploma at 13.4% compared to 7.4% in American fork.
  • More residents in Madisonville have less than a high school education at 37.0% compared to 5.7% in American fork.
  • In American fork, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.3% compared to 8.6% in Madisonville.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.