Demographics details for Madison, MS vs Federal way, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Madison, MS vs Federal way, WA.
| Data | Madison | Federal way |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 27,775 | 97,863 |
| Median Age | 40.6 years | 37.4 years |
| Median Income | $124,575 | $80,360 |
| Married Families | 51.0% | 39.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.3 | 5.7 |
Population Comparison: Madison vs Federal way
- The population in Federal way is higher at 97,863, compared to 27,775 in Madison.
- Residents in Madison have a higher median age of 40.6 years compared to 37.4 years in Federal way.
- Madison has a higher median income of $124,575 compared to $80,360 in Federal way.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Madison at 51.0% compared to 39.0% in Federal way.
- The poverty level is higher in Federal way at 9%, compared to 5% in Madison.
- Federal way has a higher unemployment rate at 5.7% compared to 2.3% in Madison.
Demographics
Demographics Madison vs Federal way provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Madison | Federal way |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 13 | 17 |
| White | 78 | 34 |
| Asian | 6 | 15 |
| Hispanic | 1 | 19 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 14 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Madison vs Federal way
- In Federal way, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 17% compared to 13% in Madison.
- Madison has a higher percentage of White residents at 78% compared to 34% in Federal way.
- In Federal way, the Asian population stands at 15%, greater than 6% in Madison.
- Federal way has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 19%, compared to 1% in Madison.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Federal way at 14%, compared to 2% in Madison.
- In Federal way, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Madison.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Madison | Federal way |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 12.2% | 17.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 7.1% | 10.9% |
| Depression | 19.3% | 24.7% |
| Smoking | 8.9% | 12.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.7% | 16.5% |
| Obesity | 29.7% | 27.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Madison vs Federal way
- In Federal way, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.5% compared to 12.2% in Madison.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Federal way at 24.7% versus 19.3% in Madison.
- Federal way has a higher smoking rate at 12.7% compared to 8.9% in Madison.
- Binge drinking is more common in Madison at 17.7% compared to 16.5% in Federal way.
- Obesity rates are higher in Madison at 29.7% compared to 27.2% in Federal way.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Federal way at 12.0% compared to 7.0% in Madison.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Madison | Federal way |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.1% (17) | 1.8% (1,735) |
| High School Diploma | 5.3% (1,471) | 15.3% (15,003) |
| Less than High School | 2.6% (723) | 11.0% (10,805) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 43.7% (12,135) | 21.2% (20,761) |
Education Levels Comparison: Madison vs Federal way
- In Federal way, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 0.1% in Madison.
- In Federal way, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.3% compared to 5.3% in Madison.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Federal way at 11.0%, compared to 2.6% in Madison.
- A higher percentage of residents in Madison hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 43.7% compared to 21.2% in Federal way.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.