Demographics details for Madison, MS vs Earlham, IA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Madison, MS vs Earlham, IA.
| Data | Madison | Earlham |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 27,775 | 1,423 |
| Median Age | 40.6 years | 41.1 years |
| Median Income | $124,575 | $103,977 |
| Married Families | 51.0% | 45.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.3 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Madison vs Earlham
- In Madison, the population is higher at 27,775, compared to 1,423 in Earlham.
- The median age in Earlham is higher at 41.1 years, compared to 40.6 years in Madison.
- Madison has a higher median income of $124,575 compared to $103,977 in Earlham.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Madison at 51.0% compared to 45.0% in Earlham.
- The poverty level is identical in both Madison and Earlham at 5%.
- Earlham has a higher unemployment rate at 3.2% compared to 2.3% in Madison.
Demographics
Demographics Madison vs Earlham provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Madison | Earlham |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 13 | 2 |
| White | 78 | 95 |
| Asian | 6 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 1 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 2 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Madison vs Earlham
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Madison at 13% compared to 2% in Earlham.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Earlham at 95% compared to 78% in Madison.
- The Asian population is larger in Madison at 6% compared to 0% in Earlham.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Madison and Earlham at 1%.
- Both Madison and Earlham have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 2%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Madison and Earlham at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Madison | Earlham |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 12.2% | 14.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 7.1% | 8.5% |
| Depression | 19.3% | 18.4% |
| Smoking | 8.9% | 14.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.7% | 23.0% |
| Obesity | 29.7% | 37.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Madison vs Earlham
- In Earlham, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 14.4% compared to 12.2% in Madison.
- Depression is more prevalent in Madison at 19.3% compared to 18.4% in Earlham.
- Earlham has a higher smoking rate at 14.6% compared to 8.9% in Madison.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Earlham at 23.0% compared to 17.7% in Madison.
- Earlham has higher obesity rates at 37.3% compared to 29.7% in Madison.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Earlham at 10.0% compared to 7.0% in Madison.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Madison | Earlham |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.1% (17) | 0.7% (10) |
| High School Diploma | 5.3% (1,471) | 13.8% (197) |
| Less than High School | 2.6% (723) | 6.0% (85) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 43.7% (12,135) | 17.0% (242) |
Education Levels Comparison: Madison vs Earlham
- In Earlham, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.1% in Madison.
- In Earlham, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 13.8% compared to 5.3% in Madison.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Earlham at 6.0%, compared to 2.6% in Madison.
- A higher percentage of residents in Madison hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 43.7% compared to 17.0% in Earlham.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.