Demographics details for Madison, MS vs Diamond bar, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Madison, MS vs Diamond bar, CA.
| Data | Madison | Diamond bar |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 27,775 | 52,855 |
| Median Age | 40.6 years | 44.7 years |
| Median Income | $124,575 | $106,881 |
| Married Families | 51.0% | 49.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.3 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Madison vs Diamond bar
- The population in Diamond bar is higher at 52,855, compared to 27,775 in Madison.
- The median age in Diamond bar is higher at 44.7 years, compared to 40.6 years in Madison.
- Madison has a higher median income of $124,575 compared to $106,881 in Diamond bar.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Madison at 51.0% compared to 49.0% in Diamond bar.
- The poverty level is higher in Diamond bar at 8%, compared to 5% in Madison.
- Diamond bar has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 2.3% in Madison.
Demographics
Demographics Madison vs Diamond bar provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Madison | Diamond bar |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 13 | 4 |
| White | 78 | 6 |
| Asian | 6 | 61 |
| Hispanic | 1 | 20 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 8 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Madison vs Diamond bar
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Madison at 13% compared to 4% in Diamond bar.
- Madison has a higher percentage of White residents at 78% compared to 6% in Diamond bar.
- In Diamond bar, the Asian population stands at 61%, greater than 6% in Madison.
- Diamond bar has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 20%, compared to 1% in Madison.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Diamond bar at 8%, compared to 2% in Madison.
- In Diamond bar, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Madison.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Madison | Diamond bar |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 12.2% | 11.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 7.1% | 7.3% |
| Depression | 19.3% | 11.7% |
| Smoking | 8.9% | 6.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.7% | 13.2% |
| Obesity | 29.7% | 19.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Madison vs Diamond bar
- More residents in Madison report poor mental health at 12.2% compared to 11.4% in Diamond bar.
- Depression is more prevalent in Madison at 19.3% compared to 11.7% in Diamond bar.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Madison at 8.9% compared to 6.8% in Diamond bar.
- Binge drinking is more common in Madison at 17.7% compared to 13.2% in Diamond bar.
- Obesity rates are higher in Madison at 29.7% compared to 19.3% in Diamond bar.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Diamond bar at 8.0% compared to 7.0% in Madison.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Madison | Diamond bar |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.1% (17) | 2.4% (1,281) |
| High School Diploma | 5.3% (1,471) | 9.0% (4,746) |
| Less than High School | 2.6% (723) | 7.6% (4,036) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 43.7% (12,135) | 39.3% (20,796) |
Education Levels Comparison: Madison vs Diamond bar
- In Diamond bar, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.4% compared to 0.1% in Madison.
- In Diamond bar, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 9.0% compared to 5.3% in Madison.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Diamond bar at 7.6%, compared to 2.6% in Madison.
- A higher percentage of residents in Madison hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 43.7% compared to 39.3% in Diamond bar.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.