Demographics details for Madison heights, VA vs Pratt, KS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Madison heights, VA vs Pratt, KS.
Data | Madison heights | Pratt |
---|---|---|
Population | 10,694 | 9,067 |
Median Age | 44.1 years | 37.6 years |
Median Income | $59,570 | $61,685 |
Married Families | 38.0% | 36.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.1 |
Population Comparison: Madison heights vs Pratt
- In Madison heights, the population is higher at 10,694, compared to 9,067 in Pratt.
- Residents in Madison heights have a higher median age of 44.1 years compared to 37.6 years in Pratt.
- Pratt has a higher median income of $61,685, compared to $59,570 in Madison heights.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Madison heights at 38.0% compared to 36.0% in Pratt.
- The poverty level is identical in both Madison heights and Pratt at 12%.
- The unemployment rate in Madison heights is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.1% in Pratt.
Demographics
Demographics Madison heights vs Pratt provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Madison heights | Pratt |
---|---|---|
Black | 23 | 2 |
White | 71 | 83 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 3 | 8 |
Two or More Races | 3 | 6 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Madison heights vs Pratt
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Madison heights at 23% compared to 2% in Pratt.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Pratt at 83% compared to 71% in Madison heights.
- Both Madison heights and Pratt have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Pratt has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 8%, compared to 3% in Madison heights.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Pratt at 6%, compared to 3% in Madison heights.
- In Pratt, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Madison heights.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Madison heights | Pratt |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.3% | 15.4% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.1% | 9.9% |
Depression | 24.7% | 19.7% |
Smoking | 19.0% | 17.0% |
Binge Drinking | 17.3% | 19.0% |
Obesity | 36.8% | 39.4% |
Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Madison heights vs Pratt
- More residents in Madison heights report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 15.4% in Pratt.
- Depression is more prevalent in Madison heights at 24.7% compared to 19.7% in Pratt.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Madison heights at 19.0% compared to 17.0% in Pratt.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Pratt at 19.0% compared to 17.3% in Madison heights.
- Pratt has higher obesity rates at 39.4% compared to 36.8% in Madison heights.
- Disability percentages are higher in Madison heights at 20.0% compared to 13.0% in Pratt.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Madison heights | Pratt |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.6% (171) | 0.2% (22) |
High School Diploma | 20.6% (2,206) | 15.0% (1,362) |
Less than High School | 16.4% (1,753) | 10.3% (936) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.3% (1,207) | 18.0% (1,634) |
Education Levels Comparison: Madison heights vs Pratt
- A higher percentage of residents in Madison heights have no formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 0.2% in Pratt.
- A higher percentage of residents in Madison heights hold a high school diploma at 20.6% compared to 15.0% in Pratt.
- More residents in Madison heights have less than a high school education at 16.4% compared to 10.3% in Pratt.
- In Pratt, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.0% compared to 11.3% in Madison heights.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.