Demographics details for Madison heights, VA vs Hobbs, NM
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Madison heights, VA vs Hobbs, NM.
Data | Madison heights | Hobbs |
---|---|---|
Population | 10,694 | 39,648 |
Median Age | 44.1 years | 30.8 years |
Median Income | $59,570 | $63,804 |
Married Families | 38.0% | 32.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 15% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.9 |
Population Comparison: Madison heights vs Hobbs
- The population in Hobbs is higher at 39,648, compared to 10,694 in Madison heights.
- Residents in Madison heights have a higher median age of 44.1 years compared to 30.8 years in Hobbs.
- Hobbs has a higher median income of $63,804, compared to $59,570 in Madison heights.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Madison heights at 38.0% compared to 32.0% in Hobbs.
- The poverty level is higher in Hobbs at 15%, compared to 12% in Madison heights.
- Hobbs has a higher unemployment rate at 4.9% compared to 3.5% in Madison heights.
Demographics
Demographics Madison heights vs Hobbs provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Madison heights | Hobbs |
---|---|---|
Black | 23 | 6 |
White | 71 | 4 |
Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
Hispanic | 3 | 63 |
Two or More Races | 3 | 25 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Madison heights vs Hobbs
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Madison heights at 23% compared to 6% in Hobbs.
- Madison heights has a higher percentage of White residents at 71% compared to 4% in Hobbs.
- In Hobbs, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Madison heights.
- Hobbs has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 63%, compared to 3% in Madison heights.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Hobbs at 25%, compared to 3% in Madison heights.
- In Hobbs, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Madison heights.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Madison heights | Hobbs |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.3% | 17.1% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.1% | 13.3% |
Depression | 24.7% | 20.6% |
Smoking | 19.0% | 17.7% |
Binge Drinking | 17.3% | 15.4% |
Obesity | 36.8% | 41.7% |
Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Madison heights vs Hobbs
- More residents in Madison heights report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 17.1% in Hobbs.
- Depression is more prevalent in Madison heights at 24.7% compared to 20.6% in Hobbs.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Madison heights at 19.0% compared to 17.7% in Hobbs.
- Binge drinking is more common in Madison heights at 17.3% compared to 15.4% in Hobbs.
- Hobbs has higher obesity rates at 41.7% compared to 36.8% in Madison heights.
- Disability percentages are higher in Madison heights at 20.0% compared to 11.0% in Hobbs.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Madison heights | Hobbs |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.6% (171) | 2.2% (856) |
High School Diploma | 20.6% (2,206) | 15.9% (6,312) |
Less than High School | 16.4% (1,753) | 26.2% (10,381) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.3% (1,207) | 9.2% (3,667) |
Education Levels Comparison: Madison heights vs Hobbs
- In Hobbs, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.2% compared to 1.6% in Madison heights.
- A higher percentage of residents in Madison heights hold a high school diploma at 20.6% compared to 15.9% in Hobbs.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Hobbs at 26.2%, compared to 16.4% in Madison heights.
- A higher percentage of residents in Madison heights hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.3% compared to 9.2% in Hobbs.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.