Demographics details for Macon, MO vs Chickasha, OK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Macon, MO vs Chickasha, OK.
| Data | Macon | Chickasha |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 15,049 | 16,549 |
| Median Age | 43.0 years | 36.4 years |
| Median Income | $54,113 | $55,136 |
| Married Families | 43.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | 14% | 17% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Macon vs Chickasha
- The population in Chickasha is higher at 16,549, compared to 15,049 in Macon.
- Residents in Macon have a higher median age of 43.0 years compared to 36.4 years in Chickasha.
- Chickasha has a higher median income of $55,136, compared to $54,113 in Macon.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Macon at 43.0% compared to 34.0% in Chickasha.
- The poverty level is higher in Chickasha at 17%, compared to 14% in Macon.
- The unemployment rate in Macon is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.2% in Chickasha.
Demographics
Demographics Macon vs Chickasha provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Macon | Chickasha |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 6 |
| White | 92 | 71 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 2 | 8 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 11 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 4 |
Demographics Comparison: Macon vs Chickasha
- In Chickasha, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 6% compared to 2% in Macon.
- Macon has a higher percentage of White residents at 92% compared to 71% in Chickasha.
- The Asian population is larger in Macon at 1% compared to 0% in Chickasha.
- Chickasha has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 8%, compared to 2% in Macon.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Chickasha at 11%, compared to 3% in Macon.
- In Chickasha, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 4%, compared to 0% in Macon.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Macon | Chickasha |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.8% | 19.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.7% | 13.7% |
| Depression | 24.4% | 25.4% |
| Smoking | 21.8% | 21.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.7% | 13.8% |
| Obesity | 41.6% | 40.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Macon vs Chickasha
- In Chickasha, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 17.8% in Macon.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Chickasha at 25.4% versus 24.4% in Macon.
- Smoking rates are the same in both Macon and Chickasha at 21.8%.
- Binge drinking is more common in Macon at 18.7% compared to 13.8% in Chickasha.
- Obesity rates are higher in Macon at 41.6% compared to 40.8% in Chickasha.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Chickasha at 18.0% compared to 17.0% in Macon.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Macon | Chickasha |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (46) | 0.5% (78) |
| High School Diploma | 27.6% (4,161) | 22.5% (3,730) |
| Less than High School | 11.8% (1,769) | 13.1% (2,160) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.1% (1,823) | 12.5% (2,066) |
Education Levels Comparison: Macon vs Chickasha
- In Chickasha, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.3% in Macon.
- A higher percentage of residents in Macon hold a high school diploma at 27.6% compared to 22.5% in Chickasha.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Chickasha at 13.1%, compared to 11.8% in Macon.
- In Chickasha, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.5% compared to 12.1% in Macon.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.