Demographics details for Macclenny, FL vs Garden city, KS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Macclenny, FL vs Garden city, KS.
Data | Macclenny | Garden city |
---|---|---|
Population | 7,670 | 27,519 |
Median Age | 37.5 years | 32.3 years |
Median Income | $62,134 | $67,500 |
Married Families | 32.0% | 37.0% |
Poverty Level | 11% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Macclenny vs Garden city
- The population in Garden city is higher at 27,519, compared to 7,670 in Macclenny.
- Residents in Macclenny have a higher median age of 37.5 years compared to 32.3 years in Garden city.
- Garden city has a higher median income of $67,500, compared to $62,134 in Macclenny.
- In Garden city, the percentage of married families is higher at 37.0%, compared to 32.0% in Macclenny.
- The poverty level is higher in Garden city at 12%, compared to 11% in Macclenny.
- The unemployment rate in Macclenny is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.2% in Garden city.
Demographics
Demographics Macclenny vs Garden city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Macclenny | Garden city |
---|---|---|
Black | 19 | 6 |
White | 66 | 16 |
Asian | 1 | 5 |
Hispanic | 4 | 55 |
Two or More Races | 9 | 18 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Macclenny vs Garden city
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Macclenny at 19% compared to 6% in Garden city.
- Macclenny has a higher percentage of White residents at 66% compared to 16% in Garden city.
- In Garden city, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 1% in Macclenny.
- Garden city has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 55%, compared to 4% in Macclenny.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Garden city at 18%, compared to 9% in Macclenny.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Macclenny at 1% compared to 0% in Garden city.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Macclenny | Garden city |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.2% | 15.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.2% | 11.8% |
Depression | 20.4% | 18.2% |
Smoking | 22.6% | 18.5% |
Binge Drinking | 17.1% | 17.7% |
Obesity | 36.5% | 38.7% |
Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Macclenny vs Garden city
- More residents in Macclenny report poor mental health at 17.2% compared to 15.3% in Garden city.
- Depression is more prevalent in Macclenny at 20.4% compared to 18.2% in Garden city.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Macclenny at 22.6% compared to 18.5% in Garden city.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Garden city at 17.7% compared to 17.1% in Macclenny.
- Garden city has higher obesity rates at 38.7% compared to 36.5% in Macclenny.
- Disability percentages are higher in Macclenny at 14.0% compared to 13.0% in Garden city.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Macclenny | Garden city |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.1% (4) | 3.5% (967) |
High School Diploma | 17.8% (1,365) | 10.9% (2,993) |
Less than High School | 13.5% (1,033) | 34.9% (9,615) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.4% (799) | 11.0% (3,034) |
Education Levels Comparison: Macclenny vs Garden city
- In Garden city, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.5% compared to 0.1% in Macclenny.
- A higher percentage of residents in Macclenny hold a high school diploma at 17.8% compared to 10.9% in Garden city.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Garden city at 34.9%, compared to 13.5% in Macclenny.
- In Garden city, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.0% compared to 10.4% in Macclenny.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.