Demographics details for Macclenny, FL vs Garden city, KS

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Macclenny, FL vs Garden city, KS.

Data Macclenny Garden city
Population 7,670 27,519
Median Age 37.5 years 32.3 years
Median Income $62,134 $67,500
Married Families 32.0% 37.0%
Poverty Level 11% 12%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 3.2

Population Comparison: Macclenny vs Garden city

  • The population in Garden city is higher at 27,519, compared to 7,670 in Macclenny.
  • Residents in Macclenny have a higher median age of 37.5 years compared to 32.3 years in Garden city.
  • Garden city has a higher median income of $67,500, compared to $62,134 in Macclenny.
  • In Garden city, the percentage of married families is higher at 37.0%, compared to 32.0% in Macclenny.
  • The poverty level is higher in Garden city at 12%, compared to 11% in Macclenny.
  • The unemployment rate in Macclenny is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.2% in Garden city.

Demographics

Demographics Macclenny vs Garden city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Macclenny Garden city
Black 19 6
White 66 16
Asian 1 5
Hispanic 4 55
Two or More Races 9 18
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Macclenny vs Garden city

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Macclenny at 19% compared to 6% in Garden city.
  • Macclenny has a higher percentage of White residents at 66% compared to 16% in Garden city.
  • In Garden city, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 1% in Macclenny.
  • Garden city has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 55%, compared to 4% in Macclenny.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Garden city at 18%, compared to 9% in Macclenny.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Macclenny at 1% compared to 0% in Garden city.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Macclenny Garden city
Mental Health Not Good 17.2% 15.3%
Physical Health Not Good 11.2% 11.8%
Depression 20.4% 18.2%
Smoking 22.6% 18.5%
Binge Drinking 17.1% 17.7%
Obesity 36.5% 38.7%
Disability Percentage 14.0% 13.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Macclenny vs Garden city

  • More residents in Macclenny report poor mental health at 17.2% compared to 15.3% in Garden city.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Macclenny at 20.4% compared to 18.2% in Garden city.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Macclenny at 22.6% compared to 18.5% in Garden city.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Garden city at 17.7% compared to 17.1% in Macclenny.
  • Garden city has higher obesity rates at 38.7% compared to 36.5% in Macclenny.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Macclenny at 14.0% compared to 13.0% in Garden city.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Macclenny Garden city
No Schooling 0.1% (4) 3.5% (967)
High School Diploma 17.8% (1,365) 10.9% (2,993)
Less than High School 13.5% (1,033) 34.9% (9,615)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 10.4% (799) 11.0% (3,034)

Education Levels Comparison: Macclenny vs Garden city

  • In Garden city, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.5% compared to 0.1% in Macclenny.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Macclenny hold a high school diploma at 17.8% compared to 10.9% in Garden city.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Garden city at 34.9%, compared to 13.5% in Macclenny.
  • In Garden city, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.0% compared to 10.4% in Macclenny.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.