Demographics details for Macclenny, FL vs Fishing creek, MD
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Macclenny, FL vs Fishing creek, MD.
| Data | Macclenny | Fishing creek |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 7,670 | 235 |
| Median Age | 37.5 years | 55.9 years |
| Median Income | $62,134 | $76,250 |
| Married Families | 32.0% | 58.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Macclenny vs Fishing creek
- In Macclenny, the population is higher at 7,670, compared to 235 in Fishing creek.
- The median age in Fishing creek is higher at 55.9 years, compared to 37.5 years in Macclenny.
- Fishing creek has a higher median income of $76,250, compared to $62,134 in Macclenny.
- In Fishing creek, the percentage of married families is higher at 58.0%, compared to 32.0% in Macclenny.
- Macclenny has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 0% in Fishing creek.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Macclenny and Fishing creek at 3.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Macclenny vs Fishing creek provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Macclenny | Fishing creek |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 19 | Data is updating |
| White | 66 | 100 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 4 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 9 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Macclenny vs Fishing creek
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Macclenny at 19% compared to 0% in Fishing creek.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Fishing creek at 100% compared to 66% in Macclenny.
- The Asian population is larger in Macclenny at 1% compared to 0% in Fishing creek.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Macclenny at 4% compared to 0% in Fishing creek.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Macclenny at 9% compared to 0% in Fishing creek.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Macclenny at 1% compared to 0% in Fishing creek.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Macclenny | Fishing creek |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.2% | 15.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.2% | 9.6% |
| Depression | 20.4% | 21.2% |
| Smoking | 22.6% | 15.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.1% | 16.8% |
| Obesity | 36.5% | 33.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 28.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Macclenny vs Fishing creek
- More residents in Macclenny report poor mental health at 17.2% compared to 15.3% in Fishing creek.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Fishing creek at 21.2% versus 20.4% in Macclenny.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Macclenny at 22.6% compared to 15.1% in Fishing creek.
- Binge drinking is more common in Macclenny at 17.1% compared to 16.8% in Fishing creek.
- Obesity rates are higher in Macclenny at 36.5% compared to 33.1% in Fishing creek.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Fishing creek at 28.0% compared to 14.0% in Macclenny.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Macclenny | Fishing creek |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.1% (4) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 17.8% (1,365) | 34.5% (81) |
| Less than High School | 13.5% (1,033) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.4% (799) | 16.2% (38) |
Education Levels Comparison: Macclenny vs Fishing creek
- A higher percentage of residents in Macclenny have no formal schooling at 0.1% compared to 0.0% in Fishing creek.
- In Fishing creek, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 34.5% compared to 17.8% in Macclenny.
- More residents in Macclenny have less than a high school education at 13.5% compared to 0.0% in Fishing creek.
- In Fishing creek, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.2% compared to 10.4% in Macclenny.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.