Demographics details for Macclenny, FL vs Big bear lake, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Macclenny, FL vs Big bear lake, CA.
| Data | Macclenny | Big bear lake |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 7,670 | 5,031 |
| Median Age | 37.5 years | 47.5 years |
| Median Income | $62,134 | $70,020 |
| Married Families | 32.0% | 42.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Macclenny vs Big bear lake
- In Macclenny, the population is higher at 7,670, compared to 5,031 in Big bear lake.
- The median age in Big bear lake is higher at 47.5 years, compared to 37.5 years in Macclenny.
- Big bear lake has a higher median income of $70,020, compared to $62,134 in Macclenny.
- In Big bear lake, the percentage of married families is higher at 42.0%, compared to 32.0% in Macclenny.
- Macclenny has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 10% in Big bear lake.
- Big bear lake has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 3.5% in Macclenny.
Demographics
Demographics Macclenny vs Big bear lake provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Macclenny | Big bear lake |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 19 | Data is updating |
| White | 66 | 50 |
| Asian | 1 | 3 |
| Hispanic | 4 | 30 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 16 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Macclenny vs Big bear lake
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Macclenny at 19% compared to 0% in Big bear lake.
- Macclenny has a higher percentage of White residents at 66% compared to 50% in Big bear lake.
- In Big bear lake, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 1% in Macclenny.
- Big bear lake has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 30%, compared to 4% in Macclenny.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Big bear lake at 16%, compared to 9% in Macclenny.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Macclenny and Big bear lake at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Macclenny | Big bear lake |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.2% | 17.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.2% | 12.1% |
| Depression | 20.4% | 20.5% |
| Smoking | 22.6% | 14.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.1% | 17.0% |
| Obesity | 36.5% | 37.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Macclenny vs Big bear lake
- In Big bear lake, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.4% compared to 17.2% in Macclenny.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Big bear lake at 20.5% versus 20.4% in Macclenny.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Macclenny at 22.6% compared to 14.1% in Big bear lake.
- Binge drinking is more common in Macclenny at 17.1% compared to 17.0% in Big bear lake.
- Big bear lake has higher obesity rates at 37.0% compared to 36.5% in Macclenny.
- Disability percentages are higher in Macclenny at 14.0% compared to 9.0% in Big bear lake.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Macclenny | Big bear lake |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.1% (4) | 0.7% (37) |
| High School Diploma | 17.8% (1,365) | 16.4% (825) |
| Less than High School | 13.5% (1,033) | 12.6% (634) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.4% (799) | 25.7% (1,294) |
Education Levels Comparison: Macclenny vs Big bear lake
- In Big bear lake, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.1% in Macclenny.
- A higher percentage of residents in Macclenny hold a high school diploma at 17.8% compared to 16.4% in Big bear lake.
- More residents in Macclenny have less than a high school education at 13.5% compared to 12.6% in Big bear lake.
- In Big bear lake, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 25.7% compared to 10.4% in Macclenny.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.