Demographics details for Macclenny, FL vs Baring, MO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Macclenny, FL vs Baring, MO.
| Data | Macclenny | Baring |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 7,670 | 123 |
| Median Age | 37.5 years | 46.0 years |
| Median Income | $62,134 | $38,750 |
| Married Families | 32.0% | 8.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 14% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Macclenny vs Baring
- In Macclenny, the population is higher at 7,670, compared to 123 in Baring.
- The median age in Baring is higher at 46.0 years, compared to 37.5 years in Macclenny.
- Macclenny has a higher median income of $62,134 compared to $38,750 in Baring.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Macclenny at 32.0% compared to 8.0% in Baring.
- The poverty level is higher in Baring at 14%, compared to 11% in Macclenny.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Macclenny and Baring at 3.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Macclenny vs Baring provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Macclenny | Baring |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 19 | Data is updating |
| White | 66 | 100 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 4 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 9 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Macclenny vs Baring
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Macclenny at 19% compared to 0% in Baring.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Baring at 100% compared to 66% in Macclenny.
- The Asian population is larger in Macclenny at 1% compared to 0% in Baring.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Macclenny at 4% compared to 0% in Baring.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Macclenny at 9% compared to 0% in Baring.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Macclenny at 1% compared to 0% in Baring.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Macclenny | Baring |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.2% | 20.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.2% | 15.1% |
| Depression | 20.4% | 27.0% |
| Smoking | 22.6% | 25.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.1% | 16.3% |
| Obesity | 36.5% | 41.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 2.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Macclenny vs Baring
- In Baring, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.2% compared to 17.2% in Macclenny.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Baring at 27.0% versus 20.4% in Macclenny.
- Baring has a higher smoking rate at 25.5% compared to 22.6% in Macclenny.
- Binge drinking is more common in Macclenny at 17.1% compared to 16.3% in Baring.
- Baring has higher obesity rates at 41.9% compared to 36.5% in Macclenny.
- Disability percentages are higher in Macclenny at 14.0% compared to 2.0% in Baring.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Macclenny | Baring |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.1% (4) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 17.8% (1,365) | 12.2% (15) |
| Less than High School | 13.5% (1,033) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.4% (799) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Macclenny vs Baring
- A higher percentage of residents in Macclenny have no formal schooling at 0.1% compared to 0.0% in Baring.
- A higher percentage of residents in Macclenny hold a high school diploma at 17.8% compared to 12.2% in Baring.
- More residents in Macclenny have less than a high school education at 13.5% compared to 0.0% in Baring.
- A higher percentage of residents in Macclenny hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.4% compared to 0.0% in Baring.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.