Demographics details for Macclenny, FL vs Arlington, MA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Macclenny, FL vs Arlington, MA.
| Data | Macclenny | Arlington |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 7,670 | 45,906 |
| Median Age | 37.5 years | 40.7 years |
| Median Income | $62,134 | $136,312 |
| Married Families | 32.0% | 45.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 3% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Macclenny vs Arlington
- The population in Arlington is higher at 45,906, compared to 7,670 in Macclenny.
- The median age in Arlington is higher at 40.7 years, compared to 37.5 years in Macclenny.
- Arlington has a higher median income of $136,312, compared to $62,134 in Macclenny.
- In Arlington, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 32.0% in Macclenny.
- Macclenny has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 3% in Arlington.
- Arlington has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.5% in Macclenny.
Demographics
Demographics Macclenny vs Arlington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Macclenny | Arlington |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 19 | 3 |
| White | 66 | 73 |
| Asian | 1 | 13 |
| Hispanic | 4 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 6 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Macclenny vs Arlington
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Macclenny at 19% compared to 3% in Arlington.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Arlington at 73% compared to 66% in Macclenny.
- In Arlington, the Asian population stands at 13%, greater than 1% in Macclenny.
- Arlington has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 4% in Macclenny.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Macclenny at 9% compared to 6% in Arlington.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Macclenny at 1% compared to 0% in Arlington.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Macclenny | Arlington |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.2% | 12.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.2% | 7.1% |
| Depression | 20.4% | 20.1% |
| Smoking | 22.6% | 7.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.1% | 19.4% |
| Obesity | 36.5% | 22.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Macclenny vs Arlington
- More residents in Macclenny report poor mental health at 17.2% compared to 12.6% in Arlington.
- Depression is more prevalent in Macclenny at 20.4% compared to 20.1% in Arlington.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Macclenny at 22.6% compared to 7.8% in Arlington.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Arlington at 19.4% compared to 17.1% in Macclenny.
- Obesity rates are higher in Macclenny at 36.5% compared to 22.3% in Arlington.
- Disability percentages are higher in Macclenny at 14.0% compared to 8.0% in Arlington.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Macclenny | Arlington |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.1% (4) | 0.6% (256) |
| High School Diploma | 17.8% (1,365) | 6.8% (3,120) |
| Less than High School | 13.5% (1,033) | 3.8% (1,725) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.4% (799) | 54.6% (25,070) |
Education Levels Comparison: Macclenny vs Arlington
- In Arlington, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.1% in Macclenny.
- A higher percentage of residents in Macclenny hold a high school diploma at 17.8% compared to 6.8% in Arlington.
- More residents in Macclenny have less than a high school education at 13.5% compared to 3.8% in Arlington.
- In Arlington, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 54.6% compared to 10.4% in Macclenny.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.