Demographics details for Lynn, MA vs Cedar park, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Lynn, MA vs Cedar park, TX.
| Data | Lynn | Cedar park |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 100,891 | 77,642 |
| Median Age | 36.2 years | 37.6 years |
| Median Income | $70,046 | $118,903 |
| Married Families | 31.0% | 45.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.6 | 3.6 |
Population Comparison: Lynn vs Cedar park
- In Lynn, the population is higher at 100,891, compared to 77,642 in Cedar park.
- The median age in Cedar park is higher at 37.6 years, compared to 36.2 years in Lynn.
- Cedar park has a higher median income of $118,903, compared to $70,046 in Lynn.
- In Cedar park, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 31.0% in Lynn.
- Lynn has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 5% in Cedar park.
- The unemployment rate in Lynn is higher at 4.6%, compared to 3.6% in Cedar park.
Demographics
Demographics Lynn vs Cedar park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Lynn | Cedar park |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 13 | 3 |
| White | 25 | 55 |
| Asian | 6 | 12 |
| Hispanic | 43 | 20 |
| Two or More Races | 12 | 10 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Lynn vs Cedar park
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Lynn at 13% compared to 3% in Cedar park.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Cedar park at 55% compared to 25% in Lynn.
- In Cedar park, the Asian population stands at 12%, greater than 6% in Lynn.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Lynn at 43% compared to 20% in Cedar park.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Lynn at 12% compared to 10% in Cedar park.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Lynn at 1% compared to 0% in Cedar park.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Lynn | Cedar park |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.5% | 14.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.1% | 8.8% |
| Depression | 22.9% | 24.1% |
| Smoking | 17.3% | 11.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.6% | 17.9% |
| Obesity | 33.7% | 31.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Lynn vs Cedar park
- More residents in Lynn report poor mental health at 18.5% compared to 14.9% in Cedar park.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Cedar park at 24.1% versus 22.9% in Lynn.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Lynn at 17.3% compared to 11.0% in Cedar park.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Cedar park at 17.9% compared to 15.6% in Lynn.
- Obesity rates are higher in Lynn at 33.7% compared to 31.0% in Cedar park.
- Disability percentages are higher in Lynn at 15.0% compared to 8.0% in Cedar park.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Lynn | Cedar park |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 3.6% (3,642) | 0.4% (287) |
| High School Diploma | 17.3% (17,461) | 8.9% (6,896) |
| Less than High School | 27.3% (27,554) | 4.1% (3,156) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.4% (14,513) | 35.8% (27,785) |
Education Levels Comparison: Lynn vs Cedar park
- A higher percentage of residents in Lynn have no formal schooling at 3.6% compared to 0.4% in Cedar park.
- A higher percentage of residents in Lynn hold a high school diploma at 17.3% compared to 8.9% in Cedar park.
- More residents in Lynn have less than a high school education at 27.3% compared to 4.1% in Cedar park.
- In Cedar park, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 35.8% compared to 14.4% in Lynn.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.