Demographics details for Lynn haven, FL vs Stanardsville, VA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Lynn haven, FL vs Stanardsville, VA.

Data Lynn haven Stanardsville
Population 20,044 355
Median Age 35.4 years 42.2 years
Median Income $81,378 $60,833
Married Families 43.0% 54.0%
Poverty Level 7% 10%
Unemployment Rate 4.1 3.5

Population Comparison: Lynn haven vs Stanardsville

  • In Lynn haven, the population is higher at 20,044, compared to 355 in Stanardsville.
  • The median age in Stanardsville is higher at 42.2 years, compared to 35.4 years in Lynn haven.
  • Lynn haven has a higher median income of $81,378 compared to $60,833 in Stanardsville.
  • In Stanardsville, the percentage of married families is higher at 54.0%, compared to 43.0% in Lynn haven.
  • The poverty level is higher in Stanardsville at 10%, compared to 7% in Lynn haven.
  • The unemployment rate in Lynn haven is higher at 4.1%, compared to 3.5% in Stanardsville.

Demographics

Demographics Lynn haven vs Stanardsville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Lynn haven Stanardsville
Black 8 12
White 73 64
Asian 3 Data is updating
Hispanic 8 11
Two or More Races 8 13
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Lynn haven vs Stanardsville

  • In Stanardsville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 12% compared to 8% in Lynn haven.
  • Lynn haven has a higher percentage of White residents at 73% compared to 64% in Stanardsville.
  • The Asian population is larger in Lynn haven at 3% compared to 0% in Stanardsville.
  • Stanardsville has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 11%, compared to 8% in Lynn haven.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Stanardsville at 13%, compared to 8% in Lynn haven.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Lynn haven and Stanardsville at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Lynn haven Stanardsville
Mental Health Not Good 16.1% 18.0%
Physical Health Not Good 10.4% 12.0%
Depression 21.3% 24.1%
Smoking 18.6% 18.5%
Binge Drinking 16.9% 16.5%
Obesity 28.9% 36.7%
Disability Percentage 14.0% 23.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Lynn haven vs Stanardsville

  • In Stanardsville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.0% compared to 16.1% in Lynn haven.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Stanardsville at 24.1% versus 21.3% in Lynn haven.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Lynn haven at 18.6% compared to 18.5% in Stanardsville.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Lynn haven at 16.9% compared to 16.5% in Stanardsville.
  • Stanardsville has higher obesity rates at 36.7% compared to 28.9% in Lynn haven.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Stanardsville at 23.0% compared to 14.0% in Lynn haven.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Lynn haven Stanardsville
No Schooling 1.1% (217) 8.7% (31)
High School Diploma 11.8% (2,373) 27.9% (99)
Less than High School 7.9% (1,576) 28.7% (102)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 19.8% (3,974) 27.6% (98)

Education Levels Comparison: Lynn haven vs Stanardsville

  • In Stanardsville, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 8.7% compared to 1.1% in Lynn haven.
  • In Stanardsville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 27.9% compared to 11.8% in Lynn haven.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Stanardsville at 28.7%, compared to 7.9% in Lynn haven.
  • In Stanardsville, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 27.6% compared to 19.8% in Lynn haven.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.