Demographics details for Luna pier, MI vs Baring, MO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Luna pier, MI vs Baring, MO.
Data | Luna pier | Baring |
---|---|---|
Population | 1,367 | 123 |
Median Age | 52.1 years | 46.0 years |
Median Income | $48,073 | $38,750 |
Married Families | 35.0% | 8.0% |
Poverty Level | 9% | 14% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Luna pier vs Baring
- In Luna pier, the population is higher at 1,367, compared to 123 in Baring.
- Residents in Luna pier have a higher median age of 52.1 years compared to 46.0 years in Baring.
- Luna pier has a higher median income of $48,073 compared to $38,750 in Baring.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Luna pier at 35.0% compared to 8.0% in Baring.
- The poverty level is higher in Baring at 14%, compared to 9% in Luna pier.
- Baring has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.2% in Luna pier.
Demographics
Demographics Luna pier vs Baring provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Luna pier | Baring |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | Data is updating |
White | 92 | 100 |
Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 1 | Data is updating |
Two or More Races | 5 | Data is updating |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Luna pier vs Baring
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Luna pier at 1% compared to 0% in Baring.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Baring at 100% compared to 92% in Luna pier.
- The Asian population is larger in Luna pier at 1% compared to 0% in Baring.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Luna pier at 1% compared to 0% in Baring.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Luna pier at 5% compared to 0% in Baring.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Luna pier and Baring at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Luna pier | Baring |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.7% | 20.2% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.4% | 15.1% |
Depression | 25.5% | 27.0% |
Smoking | 20.2% | 25.5% |
Binge Drinking | 18.4% | 16.3% |
Obesity | 42.5% | 41.9% |
Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 2.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Luna pier vs Baring
- In Baring, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.2% compared to 18.7% in Luna pier.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Baring at 27.0% versus 25.5% in Luna pier.
- Baring has a higher smoking rate at 25.5% compared to 20.2% in Luna pier.
- Binge drinking is more common in Luna pier at 18.4% compared to 16.3% in Baring.
- Obesity rates are higher in Luna pier at 42.5% compared to 41.9% in Baring.
- Disability percentages are higher in Luna pier at 15.0% compared to 2.0% in Baring.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Luna pier | Baring |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.7% (10) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 20.4% (279) | 12.2% (15) |
Less than High School | 7.5% (102) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.7% (174) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Luna pier vs Baring
- A higher percentage of residents in Luna pier have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.0% in Baring.
- A higher percentage of residents in Luna pier hold a high school diploma at 20.4% compared to 12.2% in Baring.
- More residents in Luna pier have less than a high school education at 7.5% compared to 0.0% in Baring.
- A higher percentage of residents in Luna pier hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.7% compared to 0.0% in Baring.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.