Demographics details for Lumber bridge, NC vs Penelope, TX

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Lumber bridge, NC vs Penelope, TX.

Data Lumber bridge Penelope
Population 82 185
Median Age 43.8 years 41.5 years
Median Income $61,250 $55,000
Married Families 38.0% 59.0%
Poverty Level 12% 10%
Unemployment Rate 4.6 5.0

Population Comparison: Lumber bridge vs Penelope

  • The population in Penelope is higher at 185, compared to 82 in Lumber bridge.
  • Residents in Lumber bridge have a higher median age of 43.8 years compared to 41.5 years in Penelope.
  • Lumber bridge has a higher median income of $61,250 compared to $55,000 in Penelope.
  • In Penelope, the percentage of married families is higher at 59.0%, compared to 38.0% in Lumber bridge.
  • Lumber bridge has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 10% in Penelope.
  • Penelope has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 4.6% in Lumber bridge.

Demographics

Demographics Lumber bridge vs Penelope provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Lumber bridge Penelope
Black 7 Data is updating
White 88 44
Asian Data is updating 1
Hispanic Data is updating 39
Two or More Races Data is updating 16
American Indian 5 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Lumber bridge vs Penelope

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Lumber bridge at 7% compared to 0% in Penelope.
  • Lumber bridge has a higher percentage of White residents at 88% compared to 44% in Penelope.
  • In Penelope, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Lumber bridge.
  • Penelope has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 39%, compared to 0% in Lumber bridge.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Penelope at 16%, compared to 0% in Lumber bridge.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Lumber bridge at 5% compared to 0% in Penelope.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Lumber bridge Penelope
Mental Health Not Good 17.8% 18.9%
Physical Health Not Good 14.2% 13.9%
Depression 23.8% 24.8%
Smoking 23.0% 20.3%
Binge Drinking 16.2% 17.7%
Obesity 40.5% 39.9%
Disability Percentage 9.0% 21.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Lumber bridge vs Penelope

  • In Penelope, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.9% compared to 17.8% in Lumber bridge.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Penelope at 24.8% versus 23.8% in Lumber bridge.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Lumber bridge at 23.0% compared to 20.3% in Penelope.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Penelope at 17.7% compared to 16.2% in Lumber bridge.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Lumber bridge at 40.5% compared to 39.9% in Penelope.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Penelope at 21.0% compared to 9.0% in Lumber bridge.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Lumber bridge Penelope
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 10.3% (19)
High School Diploma 32.9% (27) 25.4% (47)
Less than High School 9.8% (8) 36.8% (68)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 7.3% (6) 18.4% (34)

Education Levels Comparison: Lumber bridge vs Penelope

  • In Penelope, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 10.3% compared to 0.0% in Lumber bridge.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Lumber bridge hold a high school diploma at 32.9% compared to 25.4% in Penelope.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Penelope at 36.8%, compared to 9.8% in Lumber bridge.
  • In Penelope, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.4% compared to 7.3% in Lumber bridge.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.