Demographics details for Lumber bridge, NC vs Montgomery, MN

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Lumber bridge, NC vs Montgomery, MN.

Data Lumber bridge Montgomery
Population 82 3,485
Median Age 43.8 years 37.9 years
Median Income $61,250 $61,677
Married Families 38.0% 34.0%
Poverty Level 12% 5%
Unemployment Rate 4.6 3.2

Population Comparison: Lumber bridge vs Montgomery

  • The population in Montgomery is higher at 3,485, compared to 82 in Lumber bridge.
  • Residents in Lumber bridge have a higher median age of 43.8 years compared to 37.9 years in Montgomery.
  • Montgomery has a higher median income of $61,677, compared to $61,250 in Lumber bridge.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Lumber bridge at 38.0% compared to 34.0% in Montgomery.
  • Lumber bridge has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 5% in Montgomery.
  • The unemployment rate in Lumber bridge is higher at 4.6%, compared to 3.2% in Montgomery.

Demographics

Demographics Lumber bridge vs Montgomery provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Lumber bridge Montgomery
Black 7 2
White 88 82
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic Data is updating 9
Two or More Races Data is updating 5
American Indian 5 2

Demographics Comparison: Lumber bridge vs Montgomery

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Lumber bridge at 7% compared to 2% in Montgomery.
  • Lumber bridge has a higher percentage of White residents at 88% compared to 82% in Montgomery.
  • Both Lumber bridge and Montgomery have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • Montgomery has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 9%, compared to 0% in Lumber bridge.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Montgomery at 5%, compared to 0% in Lumber bridge.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Lumber bridge at 5% compared to 2% in Montgomery.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Lumber bridge Montgomery
Mental Health Not Good 17.8% 15.2%
Physical Health Not Good 14.2% 9.4%
Depression 23.8% 22.7%
Smoking 23.0% 18.0%
Binge Drinking 16.2% 21.6%
Obesity 40.5% 36.9%
Disability Percentage 9.0% 10.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Lumber bridge vs Montgomery

  • More residents in Lumber bridge report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 15.2% in Montgomery.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Lumber bridge at 23.8% compared to 22.7% in Montgomery.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Lumber bridge at 23.0% compared to 18.0% in Montgomery.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Montgomery at 21.6% compared to 16.2% in Lumber bridge.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Lumber bridge at 40.5% compared to 36.9% in Montgomery.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Montgomery at 10.0% compared to 9.0% in Lumber bridge.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Lumber bridge Montgomery
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 32.9% (27) 18.5% (646)
Less than High School 9.8% (8) 6.4% (224)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 7.3% (6) 10.5% (365)

Education Levels Comparison: Lumber bridge vs Montgomery

  • The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Lumber bridge and Montgomery at 0.0%.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Lumber bridge hold a high school diploma at 32.9% compared to 18.5% in Montgomery.
  • More residents in Lumber bridge have less than a high school education at 9.8% compared to 6.4% in Montgomery.
  • In Montgomery, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.5% compared to 7.3% in Lumber bridge.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.