Demographics details for Lumber bridge, NC vs Mendenhall, MS

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Lumber bridge, NC vs Mendenhall, MS.

Data Lumber bridge Mendenhall
Population 82 2,148
Median Age 43.8 years 39.0 years
Median Income $61,250 $35,956
Married Families 38.0% 31.0%
Poverty Level 12% 20%
Unemployment Rate 4.6 5.5

Population Comparison: Lumber bridge vs Mendenhall

  • The population in Mendenhall is higher at 2,148, compared to 82 in Lumber bridge.
  • Residents in Lumber bridge have a higher median age of 43.8 years compared to 39.0 years in Mendenhall.
  • Lumber bridge has a higher median income of $61,250 compared to $35,956 in Mendenhall.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Lumber bridge at 38.0% compared to 31.0% in Mendenhall.
  • The poverty level is higher in Mendenhall at 20%, compared to 12% in Lumber bridge.
  • Mendenhall has a higher unemployment rate at 5.5% compared to 4.6% in Lumber bridge.

Demographics

Demographics Lumber bridge vs Mendenhall provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Lumber bridge Mendenhall
Black 7 65
White 88 34
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic Data is updating Data is updating
Two or More Races Data is updating 1
American Indian 5 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Lumber bridge vs Mendenhall

  • In Mendenhall, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 65% compared to 7% in Lumber bridge.
  • Lumber bridge has a higher percentage of White residents at 88% compared to 34% in Mendenhall.
  • Both Lumber bridge and Mendenhall have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Lumber bridge and Mendenhall at 0%.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Mendenhall at 1%, compared to 0% in Lumber bridge.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Lumber bridge at 5% compared to 0% in Mendenhall.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Lumber bridge Mendenhall
Mental Health Not Good 17.8% 19.1%
Physical Health Not Good 14.2% 14.6%
Depression 23.8% 24.8%
Smoking 23.0% 24.5%
Binge Drinking 16.2% 13.7%
Obesity 40.5% 46.3%
Disability Percentage 9.0% 30.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Lumber bridge vs Mendenhall

  • In Mendenhall, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 17.8% in Lumber bridge.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Mendenhall at 24.8% versus 23.8% in Lumber bridge.
  • Mendenhall has a higher smoking rate at 24.5% compared to 23.0% in Lumber bridge.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Lumber bridge at 16.2% compared to 13.7% in Mendenhall.
  • Mendenhall has higher obesity rates at 46.3% compared to 40.5% in Lumber bridge.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Mendenhall at 30.0% compared to 9.0% in Lumber bridge.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Lumber bridge Mendenhall
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.7% (16)
High School Diploma 32.9% (27) 17.9% (385)
Less than High School 9.8% (8) 20.7% (445)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 7.3% (6) 18.4% (395)

Education Levels Comparison: Lumber bridge vs Mendenhall

  • In Mendenhall, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.0% in Lumber bridge.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Lumber bridge hold a high school diploma at 32.9% compared to 17.9% in Mendenhall.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Mendenhall at 20.7%, compared to 9.8% in Lumber bridge.
  • In Mendenhall, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.4% compared to 7.3% in Lumber bridge.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.