Demographics details for Luling, TX vs Cordele, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Luling, TX vs Cordele, GA.
| Data | Luling | Cordele |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 5,545 | 9,914 |
| Median Age | 50.3 years | 36.7 years |
| Median Income | $59,773 | $33,166 |
| Married Families | 43.0% | 24.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 20% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Luling vs Cordele
- The population in Cordele is higher at 9,914, compared to 5,545 in Luling.
- Residents in Luling have a higher median age of 50.3 years compared to 36.7 years in Cordele.
- Luling has a higher median income of $59,773 compared to $33,166 in Cordele.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Luling at 43.0% compared to 24.0% in Cordele.
- The poverty level is higher in Cordele at 20%, compared to 12% in Luling.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Luling and Cordele at 4.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Luling vs Cordele provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Luling | Cordele |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 8 | 72 |
| White | 12 | 26 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 54 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 25 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Luling vs Cordele
- In Cordele, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 72% compared to 8% in Luling.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Cordele at 26% compared to 12% in Luling.
- The Asian population is larger in Luling at 1% compared to 0% in Cordele.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Luling at 54% compared to 2% in Cordele.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Luling at 25% compared to 0% in Cordele.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Luling and Cordele at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Luling | Cordele |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.4% | 20.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.4% | 16.5% |
| Depression | 23.2% | 21.7% |
| Smoking | 20.8% | 24.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.6% | 11.7% |
| Obesity | 43.9% | 46.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Luling vs Cordele
- In Cordele, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.4% compared to 19.4% in Luling.
- Depression is more prevalent in Luling at 23.2% compared to 21.7% in Cordele.
- Cordele has a higher smoking rate at 24.6% compared to 20.8% in Luling.
- Binge drinking is more common in Luling at 15.6% compared to 11.7% in Cordele.
- Cordele has higher obesity rates at 46.6% compared to 43.9% in Luling.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Cordele at 20.0% compared to 17.0% in Luling.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Luling | Cordele |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 3.9% (214) | 0.6% (61) |
| High School Diploma | 25.5% (1,415) | 19.4% (1,923) |
| Less than High School | 39.5% (2,189) | 17.1% (1,693) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.1% (560) | 8.7% (866) |
Education Levels Comparison: Luling vs Cordele
- A higher percentage of residents in Luling have no formal schooling at 3.9% compared to 0.6% in Cordele.
- A higher percentage of residents in Luling hold a high school diploma at 25.5% compared to 19.4% in Cordele.
- More residents in Luling have less than a high school education at 39.5% compared to 17.1% in Cordele.
- A higher percentage of residents in Luling hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.1% compared to 8.7% in Cordele.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.