Demographics details for Lugoff, SC vs Drakesboro, KY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Lugoff, SC vs Drakesboro, KY.
| Data | Lugoff | Drakesboro |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 9,423 | 474 |
| Median Age | 39.4 years | 42.7 years |
| Median Income | $57,885 | $39,659 |
| Married Families | 43.0% | 28.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.3 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Lugoff vs Drakesboro
- In Lugoff, the population is higher at 9,423, compared to 474 in Drakesboro.
- The median age in Drakesboro is higher at 42.7 years, compared to 39.4 years in Lugoff.
- Lugoff has a higher median income of $57,885 compared to $39,659 in Drakesboro.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Lugoff at 43.0% compared to 28.0% in Drakesboro.
- The poverty level is higher in Drakesboro at 15%, compared to 9% in Lugoff.
- The unemployment rate in Lugoff is higher at 5.3%, compared to 4.2% in Drakesboro.
Demographics
Demographics Lugoff vs Drakesboro provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Lugoff | Drakesboro |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 21 | 9 |
| White | 73 | 83 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 3 | 7 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 1 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Lugoff vs Drakesboro
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Lugoff at 21% compared to 9% in Drakesboro.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Drakesboro at 83% compared to 73% in Lugoff.
- Both Lugoff and Drakesboro have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Drakesboro has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 7%, compared to 3% in Lugoff.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Lugoff at 3% compared to 1% in Drakesboro.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Lugoff and Drakesboro at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Lugoff | Drakesboro |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.5% | 21.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.6% | 17.1% |
| Depression | 22.5% | 29.5% |
| Smoking | 17.4% | 27.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.7% | 13.8% |
| Obesity | 34.1% | 43.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 27.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Lugoff vs Drakesboro
- In Drakesboro, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.5% compared to 17.5% in Lugoff.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Drakesboro at 29.5% versus 22.5% in Lugoff.
- Drakesboro has a higher smoking rate at 27.7% compared to 17.4% in Lugoff.
- Binge drinking is more common in Lugoff at 16.7% compared to 13.8% in Drakesboro.
- Drakesboro has higher obesity rates at 43.3% compared to 34.1% in Lugoff.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Drakesboro at 27.0% compared to 13.0% in Lugoff.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Lugoff | Drakesboro |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.9% (83) | 1.7% (8) |
| High School Diploma | 19.6% (1,843) | 28.7% (136) |
| Less than High School | 8.3% (778) | 28.3% (134) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.3% (1,537) | 0.8% (4) |
Education Levels Comparison: Lugoff vs Drakesboro
- In Drakesboro, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.9% in Lugoff.
- In Drakesboro, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 28.7% compared to 19.6% in Lugoff.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Drakesboro at 28.3%, compared to 8.3% in Lugoff.
- A higher percentage of residents in Lugoff hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.3% compared to 0.8% in Drakesboro.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.