Demographics details for Lucernemines, PA vs Stillwater, MN

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Lucernemines, PA vs Stillwater, MN.

Data Lucernemines Stillwater
Population 881 19,276
Median Age 39.3 years 41.8 years
Median Income $67,135 $107,986
Married Families 47.0% 43.0%
Poverty Level 10% 5%
Unemployment Rate 5.3 3.5

Population Comparison: Lucernemines vs Stillwater

  • The population in Stillwater is higher at 19,276, compared to 881 in Lucernemines.
  • The median age in Stillwater is higher at 41.8 years, compared to 39.3 years in Lucernemines.
  • Stillwater has a higher median income of $107,986, compared to $67,135 in Lucernemines.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Lucernemines at 47.0% compared to 43.0% in Stillwater.
  • Lucernemines has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 5% in Stillwater.
  • The unemployment rate in Lucernemines is higher at 5.3%, compared to 3.5% in Stillwater.

Demographics

Demographics Lucernemines vs Stillwater provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Lucernemines Stillwater
Black Data is updating 3
White 99 83
Asian Data is updating 2
Hispanic Data is updating 7
Two or More Races 1 5
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Lucernemines vs Stillwater

  • In Stillwater, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 0% in Lucernemines.
  • Lucernemines has a higher percentage of White residents at 99% compared to 83% in Stillwater.
  • In Stillwater, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Lucernemines.
  • Stillwater has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 7%, compared to 0% in Lucernemines.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Stillwater at 5%, compared to 1% in Lucernemines.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Lucernemines and Stillwater at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Lucernemines Stillwater
Mental Health Not Good 17.6% 13.5%
Physical Health Not Good 12.1% 7.8%
Depression 23.9% 23.3%
Smoking 20.4% 13.0%
Binge Drinking 18.9% 21.5%
Obesity 39.2% 31.5%
Disability Percentage 8.0% 10.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Lucernemines vs Stillwater

  • More residents in Lucernemines report poor mental health at 17.6% compared to 13.5% in Stillwater.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Lucernemines at 23.9% compared to 23.3% in Stillwater.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Lucernemines at 20.4% compared to 13.0% in Stillwater.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Stillwater at 21.5% compared to 18.9% in Lucernemines.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Lucernemines at 39.2% compared to 31.5% in Stillwater.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Stillwater at 10.0% compared to 8.0% in Lucernemines.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Lucernemines Stillwater
No Schooling 0.1% (1) 1.0% (186)
High School Diploma 20.9% (184) 11.9% (2,297)
Less than High School 0.2% (2) 4.0% (778)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 8.6% (76) 34.4% (6,634)

Education Levels Comparison: Lucernemines vs Stillwater

  • In Stillwater, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.1% in Lucernemines.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Lucernemines hold a high school diploma at 20.9% compared to 11.9% in Stillwater.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Stillwater at 4.0%, compared to 0.2% in Lucernemines.
  • In Stillwater, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 34.4% compared to 8.6% in Lucernemines.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.