Demographics details for Lucernemines, PA vs Scottsboro, AL

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Lucernemines, PA vs Scottsboro, AL.

Data Lucernemines Scottsboro
Population 881 15,677
Median Age 39.3 years 41.7 years
Median Income $67,135 $49,287
Married Families 47.0% 36.0%
Poverty Level 10% 16%
Unemployment Rate 5.3 3.2

Population Comparison: Lucernemines vs Scottsboro

  • The population in Scottsboro is higher at 15,677, compared to 881 in Lucernemines.
  • The median age in Scottsboro is higher at 41.7 years, compared to 39.3 years in Lucernemines.
  • Lucernemines has a higher median income of $67,135 compared to $49,287 in Scottsboro.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Lucernemines at 47.0% compared to 36.0% in Scottsboro.
  • The poverty level is higher in Scottsboro at 16%, compared to 10% in Lucernemines.
  • The unemployment rate in Lucernemines is higher at 5.3%, compared to 3.2% in Scottsboro.

Demographics

Demographics Lucernemines vs Scottsboro provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Lucernemines Scottsboro
Black Data is updating 5
White 99 88
Asian Data is updating 1
Hispanic Data is updating 3
Two or More Races 1 3
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Lucernemines vs Scottsboro

  • In Scottsboro, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 0% in Lucernemines.
  • Lucernemines has a higher percentage of White residents at 99% compared to 88% in Scottsboro.
  • In Scottsboro, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Lucernemines.
  • Scottsboro has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 3%, compared to 0% in Lucernemines.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Scottsboro at 3%, compared to 1% in Lucernemines.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Lucernemines and Scottsboro at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Lucernemines Scottsboro
Mental Health Not Good 17.6% 19.8%
Physical Health Not Good 12.1% 13.6%
Depression 23.9% 24.9%
Smoking 20.4% 20.6%
Binge Drinking 18.9% 15.4%
Obesity 39.2% 37.5%
Disability Percentage 8.0% 19.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Lucernemines vs Scottsboro

  • In Scottsboro, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.8% compared to 17.6% in Lucernemines.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Scottsboro at 24.9% versus 23.9% in Lucernemines.
  • Scottsboro has a higher smoking rate at 20.6% compared to 20.4% in Lucernemines.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Lucernemines at 18.9% compared to 15.4% in Scottsboro.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Lucernemines at 39.2% compared to 37.5% in Scottsboro.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Scottsboro at 19.0% compared to 8.0% in Lucernemines.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Lucernemines Scottsboro
No Schooling 0.1% (1) 1.4% (218)
High School Diploma 20.9% (184) 19.7% (3,093)
Less than High School 0.2% (2) 16.6% (2,597)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 8.6% (76) 17.3% (2,710)

Education Levels Comparison: Lucernemines vs Scottsboro

  • In Scottsboro, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.1% in Lucernemines.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Lucernemines hold a high school diploma at 20.9% compared to 19.7% in Scottsboro.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Scottsboro at 16.6%, compared to 0.2% in Lucernemines.
  • In Scottsboro, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.3% compared to 8.6% in Lucernemines.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.