Demographics details for Lucernemines, PA vs Friendship, WI

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Lucernemines, PA vs Friendship, WI.

Data Lucernemines Friendship
Population 881 681
Median Age 39.3 years 50.3 years
Median Income $67,135 $45,208
Married Families 47.0% 33.0%
Poverty Level 10% 12%
Unemployment Rate 5.3 4.5

Population Comparison: Lucernemines vs Friendship

  • In Lucernemines, the population is higher at 881, compared to 681 in Friendship.
  • The median age in Friendship is higher at 50.3 years, compared to 39.3 years in Lucernemines.
  • Lucernemines has a higher median income of $67,135 compared to $45,208 in Friendship.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Lucernemines at 47.0% compared to 33.0% in Friendship.
  • The poverty level is higher in Friendship at 12%, compared to 10% in Lucernemines.
  • The unemployment rate in Lucernemines is higher at 5.3%, compared to 4.5% in Friendship.

Demographics

Demographics Lucernemines vs Friendship provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Lucernemines Friendship
Black Data is updating 5
White 99 84
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic Data is updating 1
Two or More Races 1 9
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Lucernemines vs Friendship

  • In Friendship, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 0% in Lucernemines.
  • Lucernemines has a higher percentage of White residents at 99% compared to 84% in Friendship.
  • Both Lucernemines and Friendship have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • Friendship has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 1%, compared to 0% in Lucernemines.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Friendship at 9%, compared to 1% in Lucernemines.
  • In Friendship, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Lucernemines.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Lucernemines Friendship
Mental Health Not Good 17.6% 17.1%
Physical Health Not Good 12.1% 12.4%
Depression 23.9% 24.3%
Smoking 20.4% 21.6%
Binge Drinking 18.9% 23.9%
Obesity 39.2% 39.3%
Disability Percentage 8.0% 13.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Lucernemines vs Friendship

  • More residents in Lucernemines report poor mental health at 17.6% compared to 17.1% in Friendship.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Friendship at 24.3% versus 23.9% in Lucernemines.
  • Friendship has a higher smoking rate at 21.6% compared to 20.4% in Lucernemines.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Friendship at 23.9% compared to 18.9% in Lucernemines.
  • Friendship has higher obesity rates at 39.3% compared to 39.2% in Lucernemines.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Friendship at 13.0% compared to 8.0% in Lucernemines.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Lucernemines Friendship
No Schooling 0.1% (1) 0.4% (3)
High School Diploma 20.9% (184) 26.9% (183)
Less than High School 0.2% (2) 26.0% (177)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 8.6% (76) 3.2% (22)

Education Levels Comparison: Lucernemines vs Friendship

  • In Friendship, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.1% in Lucernemines.
  • In Friendship, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 26.9% compared to 20.9% in Lucernemines.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Friendship at 26.0%, compared to 0.2% in Lucernemines.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Lucernemines hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 8.6% compared to 3.2% in Friendship.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.