Demographics details for Lucernemines, PA vs Forest city, NC

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Lucernemines, PA vs Forest city, NC.

Data Lucernemines Forest city
Population 881 7,358
Median Age 39.3 years 32.8 years
Median Income $67,135 $35,232
Married Families 47.0% 21.0%
Poverty Level 10% 11%
Unemployment Rate 5.3 4.5

Population Comparison: Lucernemines vs Forest city

  • The population in Forest city is higher at 7,358, compared to 881 in Lucernemines.
  • Residents in Lucernemines have a higher median age of 39.3 years compared to 32.8 years in Forest city.
  • Lucernemines has a higher median income of $67,135 compared to $35,232 in Forest city.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Lucernemines at 47.0% compared to 21.0% in Forest city.
  • The poverty level is higher in Forest city at 11%, compared to 10% in Lucernemines.
  • The unemployment rate in Lucernemines is higher at 5.3%, compared to 4.5% in Forest city.

Demographics

Demographics Lucernemines vs Forest city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Lucernemines Forest city
Black Data is updating 28
White 99 57
Asian Data is updating 2
Hispanic Data is updating 8
Two or More Races 1 5
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Lucernemines vs Forest city

  • In Forest city, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 28% compared to 0% in Lucernemines.
  • Lucernemines has a higher percentage of White residents at 99% compared to 57% in Forest city.
  • In Forest city, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Lucernemines.
  • Forest city has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 8%, compared to 0% in Lucernemines.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Forest city at 5%, compared to 1% in Lucernemines.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Lucernemines and Forest city at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Lucernemines Forest city
Mental Health Not Good 17.6% 19.0%
Physical Health Not Good 12.1% 14.4%
Depression 23.9% 24.4%
Smoking 20.4% 22.1%
Binge Drinking 18.9% 15.2%
Obesity 39.2% 41.2%
Disability Percentage 8.0% 23.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Lucernemines vs Forest city

  • In Forest city, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 17.6% in Lucernemines.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Forest city at 24.4% versus 23.9% in Lucernemines.
  • Forest city has a higher smoking rate at 22.1% compared to 20.4% in Lucernemines.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Lucernemines at 18.9% compared to 15.2% in Forest city.
  • Forest city has higher obesity rates at 41.2% compared to 39.2% in Lucernemines.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Forest city at 23.0% compared to 8.0% in Lucernemines.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Lucernemines Forest city
No Schooling 0.1% (1) 0.9% (63)
High School Diploma 20.9% (184) 15.5% (1,140)
Less than High School 0.2% (2) 13.0% (956)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 8.6% (76) 10.7% (785)

Education Levels Comparison: Lucernemines vs Forest city

  • In Forest city, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.1% in Lucernemines.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Lucernemines hold a high school diploma at 20.9% compared to 15.5% in Forest city.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Forest city at 13.0%, compared to 0.2% in Lucernemines.
  • In Forest city, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.7% compared to 8.6% in Lucernemines.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.