Demographics details for Lucernemines, PA vs Cochran, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Lucernemines, PA vs Cochran, GA.
Data | Lucernemines | Cochran |
---|---|---|
Population | 881 | 4,647 |
Median Age | 39.3 years | 28.9 years |
Median Income | $67,135 | $31,326 |
Married Families | 47.0% | 25.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 19% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.3 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Lucernemines vs Cochran
- The population in Cochran is higher at 4,647, compared to 881 in Lucernemines.
- Residents in Lucernemines have a higher median age of 39.3 years compared to 28.9 years in Cochran.
- Lucernemines has a higher median income of $67,135 compared to $31,326 in Cochran.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Lucernemines at 47.0% compared to 25.0% in Cochran.
- The poverty level is higher in Cochran at 19%, compared to 10% in Lucernemines.
- The unemployment rate in Lucernemines is higher at 5.3%, compared to 3.2% in Cochran.
Demographics
Demographics Lucernemines vs Cochran provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Lucernemines | Cochran |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 53 |
White | 99 | 40 |
Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
Hispanic | Data is updating | 2 |
Two or More Races | 1 | 3 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Lucernemines vs Cochran
- In Cochran, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 53% compared to 0% in Lucernemines.
- Lucernemines has a higher percentage of White residents at 99% compared to 40% in Cochran.
- In Cochran, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Lucernemines.
- Cochran has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 2%, compared to 0% in Lucernemines.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Cochran at 3%, compared to 1% in Lucernemines.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Lucernemines and Cochran at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Lucernemines | Cochran |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.6% | 18.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.1% | 13.7% |
Depression | 23.9% | 21.8% |
Smoking | 20.4% | 20.0% |
Binge Drinking | 18.9% | 13.6% |
Obesity | 39.2% | 38.5% |
Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Lucernemines vs Cochran
- In Cochran, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 17.6% in Lucernemines.
- Depression is more prevalent in Lucernemines at 23.9% compared to 21.8% in Cochran.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Lucernemines at 20.4% compared to 20.0% in Cochran.
- Binge drinking is more common in Lucernemines at 18.9% compared to 13.6% in Cochran.
- Obesity rates are higher in Lucernemines at 39.2% compared to 38.5% in Cochran.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Cochran at 16.0% compared to 8.0% in Lucernemines.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Lucernemines | Cochran |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.1% (1) | 1.2% (54) |
High School Diploma | 20.9% (184) | 12.2% (569) |
Less than High School | 0.2% (2) | 15.1% (703) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.6% (76) | 12.7% (592) |
Education Levels Comparison: Lucernemines vs Cochran
- In Cochran, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.1% in Lucernemines.
- A higher percentage of residents in Lucernemines hold a high school diploma at 20.9% compared to 12.2% in Cochran.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Cochran at 15.1%, compared to 0.2% in Lucernemines.
- In Cochran, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.7% compared to 8.6% in Lucernemines.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.