Demographics details for Lucernemines, PA vs Bridgeport, TX

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Lucernemines, PA vs Bridgeport, TX.

Data Lucernemines Bridgeport
Population 881 6,321
Median Age 39.3 years 33.9 years
Median Income $67,135 $96,231
Married Families 47.0% 38.0%
Poverty Level 10% 10%
Unemployment Rate 5.3 4.2

Population Comparison: Lucernemines vs Bridgeport

  • The population in Bridgeport is higher at 6,321, compared to 881 in Lucernemines.
  • Residents in Lucernemines have a higher median age of 39.3 years compared to 33.9 years in Bridgeport.
  • Bridgeport has a higher median income of $96,231, compared to $67,135 in Lucernemines.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Lucernemines at 47.0% compared to 38.0% in Bridgeport.
  • The poverty level is identical in both Lucernemines and Bridgeport at 10%.
  • The unemployment rate in Lucernemines is higher at 5.3%, compared to 4.2% in Bridgeport.

Demographics

Demographics Lucernemines vs Bridgeport provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Lucernemines Bridgeport
Black Data is updating 5
White 99 51
Asian Data is updating 1
Hispanic Data is updating 36
Two or More Races 1 5
American Indian Data is updating 2

Demographics Comparison: Lucernemines vs Bridgeport

  • In Bridgeport, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 0% in Lucernemines.
  • Lucernemines has a higher percentage of White residents at 99% compared to 51% in Bridgeport.
  • In Bridgeport, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Lucernemines.
  • Bridgeport has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 36%, compared to 0% in Lucernemines.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Bridgeport at 5%, compared to 1% in Lucernemines.
  • In Bridgeport, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Lucernemines.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Lucernemines Bridgeport
Mental Health Not Good 17.6% 18.6%
Physical Health Not Good 12.1% 14.3%
Depression 23.9% 24.0%
Smoking 20.4% 20.2%
Binge Drinking 18.9% 17.2%
Obesity 39.2% 40.0%
Disability Percentage 8.0% 7.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Lucernemines vs Bridgeport

  • In Bridgeport, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.6% compared to 17.6% in Lucernemines.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Bridgeport at 24.0% versus 23.9% in Lucernemines.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Lucernemines at 20.4% compared to 20.2% in Bridgeport.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Lucernemines at 18.9% compared to 17.2% in Bridgeport.
  • Bridgeport has higher obesity rates at 40.0% compared to 39.2% in Lucernemines.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Lucernemines at 8.0% compared to 7.0% in Bridgeport.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Lucernemines Bridgeport
No Schooling 0.1% (1) 0.4% (24)
High School Diploma 20.9% (184) 11.2% (708)
Less than High School 0.2% (2) 18.8% (1,189)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 8.6% (76) 17.2% (1,086)

Education Levels Comparison: Lucernemines vs Bridgeport

  • In Bridgeport, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.1% in Lucernemines.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Lucernemines hold a high school diploma at 20.9% compared to 11.2% in Bridgeport.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Bridgeport at 18.8%, compared to 0.2% in Lucernemines.
  • In Bridgeport, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.2% compared to 8.6% in Lucernemines.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.