Demographics details for Lucedale, MS vs Grayling, MI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Lucedale, MS vs Grayling, MI.
| Data | Lucedale | Grayling |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,988 | 1,917 |
| Median Age | 37.3 years | 48.8 years |
| Median Income | $35,662 | $30,417 |
| Married Families | 27.0% | 26.0% |
| Poverty Level | 25% | 16% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Lucedale vs Grayling
- In Lucedale, the population is higher at 2,988, compared to 1,917 in Grayling.
- The median age in Grayling is higher at 48.8 years, compared to 37.3 years in Lucedale.
- Lucedale has a higher median income of $35,662 compared to $30,417 in Grayling.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Lucedale at 27.0% compared to 26.0% in Grayling.
- Lucedale has a higher poverty level at 25% compared to 16% in Grayling.
- The unemployment rate in Lucedale is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.5% in Grayling.
Demographics
Demographics Lucedale vs Grayling provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Lucedale | Grayling |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 33 | 1 |
| White | 63 | 88 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 1 | 7 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Lucedale vs Grayling
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Lucedale at 33% compared to 1% in Grayling.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Grayling at 88% compared to 63% in Lucedale.
- In Grayling, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Lucedale.
- Grayling has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 7%, compared to 1% in Lucedale.
- Both Lucedale and Grayling have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 3%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Lucedale and Grayling at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Lucedale | Grayling |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.8% | 18.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.9% | 11.7% |
| Depression | 21.3% | 26.4% |
| Smoking | 21.4% | 19.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.7% | 19.0% |
| Obesity | 41.2% | 37.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 22.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Lucedale vs Grayling
- In Grayling, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.0% compared to 16.8% in Lucedale.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Grayling at 26.4% versus 21.3% in Lucedale.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Lucedale at 21.4% compared to 19.3% in Grayling.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Grayling at 19.0% compared to 14.7% in Lucedale.
- Obesity rates are higher in Lucedale at 41.2% compared to 37.4% in Grayling.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Grayling at 22.0% compared to 12.0% in Lucedale.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Lucedale | Grayling |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (18) | 0.7% (13) |
| High School Diploma | 14.1% (421) | 17.3% (332) |
| Less than High School | 21.8% (651) | 18.2% (348) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.9% (356) | 10.3% (197) |
Education Levels Comparison: Lucedale vs Grayling
- In Grayling, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.6% in Lucedale.
- In Grayling, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.3% compared to 14.1% in Lucedale.
- More residents in Lucedale have less than a high school education at 21.8% compared to 18.2% in Grayling.
- A higher percentage of residents in Lucedale hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.9% compared to 10.3% in Grayling.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.