Demographics details for Loves park, IL vs Waterford, CT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Loves park, IL vs Waterford, CT.
| Data | Loves park | Waterford |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 23,365 | 3,276 |
| Median Age | 36.6 years | 45.2 years |
| Median Income | $56,370 | $74,701 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.6 | 3.7 |
Population Comparison: Loves park vs Waterford
- In Loves park, the population is higher at 23,365, compared to 3,276 in Waterford.
- The median age in Waterford is higher at 45.2 years, compared to 36.6 years in Loves park.
- Waterford has a higher median income of $74,701, compared to $56,370 in Loves park.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Loves park at 35.0% compared to 34.0% in Waterford.
- Loves park has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 5% in Waterford.
- Waterford has a higher unemployment rate at 3.7% compared to 3.6% in Loves park.
Demographics
Demographics Loves park vs Waterford provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Loves park | Waterford |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 7 | 4 |
| White | 71 | 80 |
| Asian | 3 | 5 |
| Hispanic | 10 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 6 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Loves park vs Waterford
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Loves park at 7% compared to 4% in Waterford.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Waterford at 80% compared to 71% in Loves park.
- In Waterford, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 3% in Loves park.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Loves park at 10% compared to 5% in Waterford.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Loves park at 9% compared to 6% in Waterford.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Loves park and Waterford at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Loves park | Waterford |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.3% | 16.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.3% | 10.4% |
| Depression | 21.3% | 24.0% |
| Smoking | 17.0% | 17.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.0% | 17.2% |
| Obesity | 39.4% | 32.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Loves park vs Waterford
- In Waterford, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.7% compared to 16.3% in Loves park.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Waterford at 24.0% versus 21.3% in Loves park.
- Waterford has a higher smoking rate at 17.5% compared to 17.0% in Loves park.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Waterford at 17.2% compared to 17.0% in Loves park.
- Obesity rates are higher in Loves park at 39.4% compared to 32.3% in Waterford.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Waterford at 17.0% compared to 14.0% in Loves park.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Loves park | Waterford |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (97) | 0.5% (17) |
| High School Diploma | 17.1% (3,994) | 22.6% (739) |
| Less than High School | 9.7% (2,262) | 5.9% (193) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.4% (4,064) | 17.8% (582) |
Education Levels Comparison: Loves park vs Waterford
- In Waterford, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.4% in Loves park.
- In Waterford, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.6% compared to 17.1% in Loves park.
- More residents in Loves park have less than a high school education at 9.7% compared to 5.9% in Waterford.
- In Waterford, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.8% compared to 17.4% in Loves park.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.