Demographics details for Loves park, IL vs Wadesboro, NC

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Loves park, IL vs Wadesboro, NC.

Data Loves park Wadesboro
Population 23,365 4,966
Median Age 36.6 years 38.3 years
Median Income $56,370 $32,022
Married Families 35.0% 20.0%
Poverty Level 9% Data is updating
Unemployment Rate 3.6 5.0

Population Comparison: Loves park vs Wadesboro

  • In Loves park, the population is higher at 23,365, compared to 4,966 in Wadesboro.
  • The median age in Wadesboro is higher at 38.3 years, compared to 36.6 years in Loves park.
  • Loves park has a higher median income of $56,370 compared to $32,022 in Wadesboro.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Loves park at 35.0% compared to 20.0% in Wadesboro.
  • Loves park has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 0% in Wadesboro.
  • Wadesboro has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 3.6% in Loves park.

Demographics

Demographics Loves park vs Wadesboro provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Loves park Wadesboro
Black 7 70
White 71 25
Asian 3 5
Hispanic 10 Data is updating
Two or More Races 9 Data is updating
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Loves park vs Wadesboro

  • In Wadesboro, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 70% compared to 7% in Loves park.
  • Loves park has a higher percentage of White residents at 71% compared to 25% in Wadesboro.
  • In Wadesboro, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 3% in Loves park.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Loves park at 10% compared to 0% in Wadesboro.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Loves park at 9% compared to 0% in Wadesboro.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Loves park and Wadesboro at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Loves park Wadesboro
Mental Health Not Good 16.3% 18.1%
Physical Health Not Good 11.3% 13.7%
Depression 21.3% 21.6%
Smoking 17.0% 22.2%
Binge Drinking 17.0% 13.9%
Obesity 39.4% 44.3%
Disability Percentage 14.0% 20.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Loves park vs Wadesboro

  • In Wadesboro, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.1% compared to 16.3% in Loves park.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Wadesboro at 21.6% versus 21.3% in Loves park.
  • Wadesboro has a higher smoking rate at 22.2% compared to 17.0% in Loves park.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Loves park at 17.0% compared to 13.9% in Wadesboro.
  • Wadesboro has higher obesity rates at 44.3% compared to 39.4% in Loves park.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Wadesboro at 20.0% compared to 14.0% in Loves park.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Loves park Wadesboro
No Schooling 0.4% (97) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 17.1% (3,994) 19.2% (953)
Less than High School 9.7% (2,262) 11.8% (587)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 17.4% (4,064) 9.5% (472)

Education Levels Comparison: Loves park vs Wadesboro

  • A higher percentage of residents in Loves park have no formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.0% in Wadesboro.
  • In Wadesboro, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.2% compared to 17.1% in Loves park.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Wadesboro at 11.8%, compared to 9.7% in Loves park.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Loves park hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.4% compared to 9.5% in Wadesboro.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.